Development of a tool to measure holistic reflection in midwifery students and midwives

被引:2
|
作者
Bass, J. [1 ]
Sidebotham, M. [1 ]
Sweet, L. [2 ]
Creedy, D. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Univ Dr, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
关键词
Holistic reflection; Critical reflection; Midwifery; Students; Assessment; Psychometric; SELF-REFLECTION; THINKING; MODEL; INTELLIGENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.001
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Holistic reflection encompasses reflection as a continuum, incorporating critical reflection, reflexivity, critical thinking and a whole-of-person approach. The development of holistic reflection in midwifery students and midwives is rarely measured in a standardised way. Aim: To develop and test a tool to measure holistic reflection in midwifery students and midwives, for use in pre-registration and post-graduate education, and research. Design: The eight-step approach to tool development by DeVellis was followed with psychometric testing of data from a cross-sectional survey. Participants: Midwifery students (pre-registration and postgraduate), and midwifery alumni of an Australian university. Methods: Draft items (n = 84) were generated from review of the literature, qualitative research, and a theoretical model. An expert panel (n = 19) reviewed draft items resulting in 39 items. The survey included demographic details, the draft Holistic Reflection Assessment Tool, emotional intelligence subscale, and a social desirability scale. Participants repeated the online survey at two weeks to confirm test-retest reliability. Results: The 187 responses were received. Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation revealed three factors accounting for 49% of variance. Internal consistency of the tool was high (alpha = .91) and test-retest reliability at two weeks (alpha = .93) demonstrated stability. There were low correlations between social desirability (r = .22, p <.001) and emotional intelligence (r = .21, p <.001) with the new holistic reflection scale. Conclusions: The Holistic Reflection Assessment Tool is the first for midwifery. The tool was reliable, stable, and valid. Further research is warranted for criterion validity.
引用
收藏
页码:E502 / E511
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Turning reflection into learning: a practice development tool for midwifery students
    Austin, Diana
    Gilkison, Andrea
    Clemons, Janine
    REFLECTIVE PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (03) : 301 - 315
  • [2] The midwives act and the teaching of midwifery to students
    Wright, CJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1904, 1904 : 122 - 124
  • [3] Holistic Midwifery Education for Holistic Midwives: Reflecting on Personal Educational Philosophy and Pedagogy
    Madden, Bella
    JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGIC DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [4] Development of a Model of Holistic Reflection to facilitate transformative learning in student midwives
    Bass, Janice
    Fenwick, Jennifer
    Sidebotham, Mary
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2017, 30 (03) : 227 - 235
  • [5] Development of a critical thinking measure for undergraduate midwifery students
    Carter, Amanda
    Creedy, Debra
    Sidebotham, Mary
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (01) : S42 - S42
  • [6] Evaluating a standardised clinical assessment tool for pre-registration midwifery students: A cross-sectional survey of midwifery students and midwives in Australia
    Morrow, Jane
    Biggs, Laura
    Stelfox, Sara
    Phillips, Diane
    McKellar, Lois
    McLachlan, Helen
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2016, 29 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [7] The development of a midwifery specific tool to enable midwives to identify barriers and enablers to change within the midwifery clinical setting
    Davis, Sara
    Bayes, Sara
    Geraghty, Sadie
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2018, 31 : S50 - S51
  • [8] Weaving Holistic Reflection within Midwifery Education and Practice
    Bass, Janice
    Creedy, Emeritus Debra
    Sweet, Linda
    Donellan-Fernandez, Roslyn
    Sidebotham, Mary
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2022, 35 : S46 - S46
  • [9] A delphi survey of midwives and midwifery students to identify non-midwifery duties
    McKenna, H
    Hasson, F
    Smith, M
    MIDWIFERY, 2002, 18 (04) : 314 - 322
  • [10] Sustaining 'super' midwives: Building resilience in midwifery students
    Hogan, Rosemarie
    Orr, Fiona
    Cummins, Allison
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (01) : S18 - S18