Collecting information from groups: A comparison of two methods

被引:0
|
作者
Sweeney, JC
Soutar, GN
Hausknecht, DR
Dallin, RF
Johnson, LW
机构
[1] UNIV SYDNEY,GRAD SCH BUSINESS,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA
[2] EDITH COWAN UNIV,FAC BUSINESS,CHURCHLANDS,WA 6018,AUSTRALIA
[3] UNIV AKRON,DEPT MARKETING,AKRON,OH 44325
[4] CURTIN UNIV TECHNOL,GRAD SCH BUSINESS,SYDNEY,NSW 6000,AUSTRALIA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impact of personal computers when collecting qualitative data in exploratory research. Specifically, two alternative qualitative data collection techniques were compared: traditional focus groups and groups using the Group Support Systems (GSS) technology, in which participants input their responses through a computer terminal. The two types of sessions were compared in terms of general impressions, attitudes and feelings at three levels; that of the respondents, the moderators and the researchers. In addition, the efficiency of the groups in terms of the amount of information produced was examined. In summary it was felt that the GSS groups had substantial advantages over the traditional focus group in the case of a typical exploratory research study. The results and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 411
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of three methods for collecting interstitial fluid from subcutaneous tissue in mini pigs
    Xiong, Feng
    Zheng, Yu
    Ouyang, Yinggen
    Song, Xiaojing
    Jia, Shuyong
    Wang, Guangjun
    Wang, Shuyou
    Liu, Qi
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhang, Weibo
    METHODSX, 2024, 12
  • [22] A quantitative comparison of two sample methods for collecting Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Missouri
    Petry, William K.
    Fore, Stephanie A.
    Fielden, Laura J.
    Kim, Hyun-Joo
    EXPERIMENTAL AND APPLIED ACAROLOGY, 2010, 52 (04) : 427 - 438
  • [23] Comparison of two training methods identify beer aromas: "groups" against "individual"
    Chollet, S
    Valentin, D
    Meyer, A
    Leboeuf, L
    Rogeaux, M
    Flayeux, R
    Sauvageot, F
    SCIENCES DES ALIMENTS, 2002, 22 (05) : 577 - 600
  • [24] A comparison of two methods designed to identify children's or adolescents' friendship groups
    Kindelberger, Cecile
    Mallet, Pascal
    Kindermann, Thomas
    Herbe, Dominique
    ANNEE PSYCHOLOGIQUE, 2011, 111 (01): : 117 - 143
  • [25] Comparison of two methods for DIF analysis among multiple groups: a simulation study
    Stahl, Odile
    Sebille, Veronique
    Blanchin, Myriam
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S137 - S137
  • [26] A quantitative comparison of two sample methods for collecting Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Missouri
    William K. Petry
    Stephanie A. Foré
    Laura J. Fielden
    Hyun-Joo Kim
    Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2010, 52 : 427 - 438
  • [27] Collecting information: Qualitative research methods for solving workplace problems
    Campbell, KS
    TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 1999, 46 (04) : 532 - 545
  • [28] Two methods for isolation of collecting duct cells from EGFP transgenic mice.
    Miller, RL
    Zhang, P
    Brown, D
    Breton, S
    Nelson, RD
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 24A - 24A
  • [29] Brief report: Methods for collecting sexual behaviour information from South African adolescents - a comparison of paper versus personal digital assistant questionnaires
    Jaspan, Heather B.
    Flisher, Alan J.
    Myer, Landon
    Mathews, Catherine
    Seebregts, Chris
    Berwick, Jessica R.
    Wood, Robin
    Bekker, Linda-Gail
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2007, 30 (02) : 353 - 359
  • [30] Different collecting methods reveal different ecological groups of centipedes (Chilopoda)
    Tuf, Ivan Hadrian
    ZOOLOGIA, 2015, 32 (05): : 345 - 350