Collecting information from groups: A comparison of two methods

被引:0
|
作者
Sweeney, JC
Soutar, GN
Hausknecht, DR
Dallin, RF
Johnson, LW
机构
[1] UNIV SYDNEY,GRAD SCH BUSINESS,SYDNEY,NSW 2006,AUSTRALIA
[2] EDITH COWAN UNIV,FAC BUSINESS,CHURCHLANDS,WA 6018,AUSTRALIA
[3] UNIV AKRON,DEPT MARKETING,AKRON,OH 44325
[4] CURTIN UNIV TECHNOL,GRAD SCH BUSINESS,SYDNEY,NSW 6000,AUSTRALIA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impact of personal computers when collecting qualitative data in exploratory research. Specifically, two alternative qualitative data collection techniques were compared: traditional focus groups and groups using the Group Support Systems (GSS) technology, in which participants input their responses through a computer terminal. The two types of sessions were compared in terms of general impressions, attitudes and feelings at three levels; that of the respondents, the moderators and the researchers. In addition, the efficiency of the groups in terms of the amount of information produced was examined. In summary it was felt that the GSS groups had substantial advantages over the traditional focus group in the case of a typical exploratory research study. The results and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 411
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COLLECTING DIETARY INFORMATION FROM GROUPS OF OLDER PEOPLE
    CAMPBELL, VA
    DODDS, ML
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1967, 51 (01) : 29 - &
  • [2] A comparison of two methods of collecting economic data in primary care
    Patel, A
    Rendu, A
    Moran, P
    Leese, M
    Mann, A
    Knapp, M
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 22 (03) : 323 - 327
  • [3] Comparison of two methods of collecting induced sputum in asthmatic subjects
    Gershman, NH
    Wong, HH
    Liu, JT
    Mahlmeister, MJ
    Fahy, JV
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (12) : 2448 - 2453
  • [4] COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS OF COLLECTING SEMEN FROM GANDERS
    PAWLUCZUK, B
    GRUNDER, AA
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1989, 68 (12) : 1714 - 1717
  • [5] A comparison of two methods extracting respiratory information from ultrasound video
    Hu, G.
    Yao, J.
    Quan, H.
    Chen, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2377 - 2377
  • [6] Diversity of midwater cephalopods in the northern Gulf of Mexico: comparison of two collecting methods
    H. Judkins
    M. Vecchione
    A. Cook
    T. Sutton
    Marine Biodiversity, 2017, 47 : 647 - 657
  • [7] Diversity of midwater cephalopods in the northern Gulf of Mexico: comparison of two collecting methods
    Judkins, H.
    Vecchione, M.
    Cook, A.
    Sutton, T.
    MARINE BIODIVERSITY, 2017, 47 (03) : 647 - 657
  • [8] Comparison of two methods for collecting antibiotic use data on small dairy farms
    Redding, L. E.
    Cubas-Delgado, F.
    Sammel, M. D.
    Smith, G.
    Galligan, D. T.
    Levy, M. Z.
    Hennessy, S.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 114 (3-4) : 213 - 222
  • [9] Comparison of two methods for collecting free-living ticks in the Amazonian forest
    Terassini, Flavio A.
    Barbieri, Fabio S.
    Albuquerque, Saymon
    Szabo, Matias P. J.
    Camargo, Luis Marcelo A.
    Labruna, Marcelo B.
    TICKS AND TICK-BORNE DISEASES, 2010, 1 (04) : 194 - 196
  • [10] COMPARISON OF MUCUS COLLECTING METHODS IN FISH OLFACTION
    STABELL, OB
    SELSET, R
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 108 (01): : 91 - 96