Comparative Study of the Shear Bond Strengths and Bracket Failure Rates of Two Orthodontic Adhesive Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Okeke, Azubuike Chukwubumnobi [1 ]
Utomi, Ifeoma [2 ]
Folaranmi, Nkiruka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nigeria, Dept Child Dent Hlth, Enugu, Nigeria
[2] Univ Lagos, Dept Child Dent Hlth, Lagos, Nigeria
关键词
Orthodontic Brackets; Patients; Dental Bonding; Dental Materials; LIGHT; ETCH; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1590/pboci.2022.073
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) and bracket failure rates (BFR) of orthodontic brackets bonded with Light Cure adhesive against those bonded with Self Cure adhesive. Material and Methods: The study had in vitro and in vivo parts. In the in vitro part to determine SBS of Light Bond(LB)((R)) and Rely.a.Bond(RB)((R)) adhesives used in bonding brackets to 88 extracted teeth, each adhesive type was used to bond 44 brackets. The clinical study was conducted to determine the BFR of the LB(R) and RB(R) adhesives by bonding 256 teeth using each adhesive type. A standardized bonding procedure was followed in both the in vitro and in vivo parts of the study. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, independent t-test, chi-square, and Pearson Correlation statistics. A p-value of & LE; 0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 21.0 was used to analyze the data generated. Results: There was a significantly higher mean SBS 10.6MPa for LB(R) adhesive than the 7.0MPa of the RB(R) adhesive. In the in vivo study, (LB)((R)) had a greater but not significant BFR of 9.0% than RB(R) (8.0%). No significant relationship existed between the SBS of either adhesive type (as determined in vitro) and their BFR in vivo. Conclusion: Higher SBS of LB(R) did not translate to less BFR in the clinic, nor did a lower SBS of RB(R) translate to more BFR in the clinic.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS OF 6 CURRENT GENERATION DENTIN ADHESIVE SYSTEMS
    TRIOLO, PT
    SWIFT, EJ
    BARKMEIER, WW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 199 - 199
  • [22] Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesive systems.
    Lopes, GC
    Arcari, GM
    Oliveira, J
    Freitas, SFT
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1067 - 1067
  • [23] Shear bond strengths of adhesive luting systems to dental tissues.
    Issa, MH
    Watts, DC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 945 - 945
  • [24] Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesive systems
    Bae, JH
    Son, HH
    Heo, SJ
    Cho, BH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 374 - 374
  • [25] Effect of time on shear bond strength of four orthodontic adhesive systems
    Vinagre, Alexandra R.
    Messias, Ana L.
    Gomes, Marcolino A.
    Costa, Ana L.
    Ramos, Joao C.
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2014, 55 (03): : 142 - 151
  • [26] Orthodontic bracket bond strengths with hybrid glass ionomer cement.
    Schanilec, CF
    Staley, R
    Jakosben, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 298 - 298
  • [27] COMPARISON OF BOND STRENGTHS OF A NEW ORTHODONTIC BRACKET BASE WITH A CONVENTIONAL BASE
    ARICI, S
    WILLMOT, DR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 839 - 839
  • [28] COMPARISON OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKET BOND STRENGTHS - HUMAN VS BOVINE ENAMEL
    SMITH, HZ
    CASKO, JS
    LEINFELDER, KF
    UTLEY, JD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1976, 55 : B153 - B153
  • [29] Bond strengths of compomers using two dentin adhesive systems
    Somphone, P
    Pereira, PNR
    Nikaido, T
    Tagami, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1319 - 1319
  • [30] The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength
    Sharma-Sayal, SK
    Rossouw, PE
    Kulkarni, GV
    Titley, KC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 124 (01) : 74 - 82