Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and medically traumatic events (TEs) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer: a report from the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) randomized controlled trial

被引:8
|
作者
Scott, Samantha R. [1 ,2 ]
O'Daffer, Alison G. [1 ]
Bradford, Miranda C. [3 ]
Fladeboe, Kaitlyn [1 ]
Lau, Nancy [1 ]
Steineck, Angela [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Taylor, Mallory [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Yi-Frazier, Joyce P. [1 ]
Rosenberg, Abby R. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Palliat Care & Resilience Lab, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Denver, CO 80208 USA
[3] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Childrens Core Biomed Stat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
AYAs; Pediatric cancer; Psychosocial intervention; Trauma; GENERIC CORE SCALES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH; RELIABILITY; PEDSQL(TM); CHILDREN; VALIDITY; DISTRESS; DISORDER; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-020-05888-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective In adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, we examined (1) the distribution and type of traumatic events (TEs) experienced prior to baseline assessment and (2) how a resilience intervention, Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM), impacted changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for AYAs with and without TEs. Methods AYAs (12-25 years) within 1-10 weeks of diagnosis of new malignancy or ever diagnosed with advanced cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (UC) with or without PRISM. To assess TEs, we screened medical records for traditionally defined adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and medical traumatic events. Age-validated PROs assessed resilience, benefit-finding, hope, generic health-related quality of life (QoL), cancer-specific QoL, depression, and anxiety at enrollment and 6 months later. We calculated effect sizes (Cohen's d) for PRISM vs. UC effect on PRO score change at 6 months for 1+ TEs and 0 TE groups. Results Ninety-two AYAs enrolled and completed baseline surveys (44-UC, 48-PRISM; N = 74 at 6 months, 38-UC, 36-PRISM); 60% experienced 1+ TEs. PROs at baseline were similar across groups. PRISM's effect on score change was greater (Cohen's d >= 0.5) for the 1+ TE group on domains of benefit-finding and hope; and similar (d < 0.5) on domains of resilience, depression, anxiety, and both generic and cancer-specific QoL. Conclusions In AYAs with cancer, TEs occurred at similar rates as the general population. PRISM may be particularly helpful for improving benefit-finding and hope for those who have experienced TEs.
引用
收藏
页码:3773 / 3781
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Results from the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) Intervention-A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) for Teens with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
    Yi-Frazier, Joyce P.
    Hilliard, Marisa E.
    O'Donnell, Maeve B.
    Zhou, Chuan
    Ellisor, Britney M.
    Perez, Samantha Garcia
    Rojas, Yuliana
    Malik, Faisal
    Desalvo, Daniel
    Pihoker, Catherine
    Bradford, Miranda
    Scott, Samantha R.
    Rosenberg, Abby
    DIABETES, 2023, 72