Application of a Premelting Model to the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary

被引:8
|
作者
Yamauchi, Hatsuki [1 ]
Takei, Yasuko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Earthquake Res Inst, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
premelting; anelasticity; grain boundary; LAB; G discontinuity; asthenosphere; UPPER-MANTLE; POLYCRYSTAL ANELASTICITY; OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE; SEISMIC PROPERTIES; THERMAL STRUCTURE; HEAT-FLOW; MELT; ATTENUATION; CREEP; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2020GC009338
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A seismic discontinuity known as the G-discontinuity, which has been prevailingly detected in the oceanic mantle, is considered to provide evidence of a sharp lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB). We investigate whether this sharp LAB is explained by grain boundary premelting, which causes a solid-state weakening of rock from just below the solidus temperature. We use an experimentally derived mechanical model describing the effect of premelting and calculate vertical profiles of VS and QS-1 for various sets of oceanic geotherm and solidus values. Based on the realistic volatile distribution and solidus profile obtained from a model of fractional decompression melting, we show that even when the oceanic upper mantle is melt free, geotherm sufficiently approaches the solidus at various plate ages, resulting in a steep reduction in VS due to the anelastic effect of premelting. A small amount of volatile adsorbed to grain boundary plays an important role in this result. The predicted seismic discontinuity sharpness (mostly similar to 15 km) is consistent with seismological observations (<= 15 km), predicted discontinuity depth (along similar to 1300 degrees C isotherm) is deeper than observations (along 1100 degrees C isotherm), and predicted velocity reduction amplitude (similar to 1%-2%) is considerably smaller than observations (>= 5%). Because the predicted velocity reduction amplitude is subject to uncertainty resulted from the limited experimental data, further study is needed for the mechanical effect of premelting. We further discuss a discrepancy of seismological results from receiver function and SS precursor studies and from surface wave studies, making it difficult to explain both data consistently.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LITHOSPHERE-ASTHENOSPHERE BOUNDARY
    JORDAN, TH
    FYFE, WS
    [J]. GEOLOGY, 1976, 4 (12) : 770 - 772
  • [2] The Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary
    Fischer, Karen M.
    Ford, Heather A.
    Abt, David L.
    Rychert, Catherine A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, VOL 38, 2010, 38 : 551 - 575
  • [3] The Nature of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary
    Rychert, Catherine A.
    Harmon, Nicholas
    Constable, Steven
    Wang, Shunguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2020, 125 (10)
  • [4] A Global View of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary
    Rychert, Catherine A.
    Shearer, Peter M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5926) : 495 - 498
  • [5] Viscous coupling at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary
    Hoeink, Tobias
    Jellinek, A. Mark
    Lenardic, Adrian
    [J]. GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2011, 12
  • [6] Scattered wave imaging of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary
    Rychert, Catherine A.
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Fischer, Karen M.
    [J]. LITHOS, 2010, 120 (1-2) : 173 - 185
  • [7] Water and its influence on the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary
    Green, David H.
    Hibberson, William O.
    Kovacs, Istvan
    Rosenthal, Anja
    [J]. NATURE, 2010, 467 (7314) : 448 - U97
  • [8] The Gutenberg Discontinuity: Melt at the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary
    Schmerr, Nicholas
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2012, 335 (6075) : 1480 - 1483
  • [9] Magmas trapped at the continental lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary
    Crepisson, C.
    Morard, G.
    Bureau, H.
    Prouteau, G.
    Morizet, Y.
    Petitgirard, S.
    Sanloup, C.
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 393 : 105 - 112
  • [10] Seismic receiver functions and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary
    Kind, Rainer
    Yuan, Xiaohui
    Kumar, Prakash
    [J]. TECTONOPHYSICS, 2012, 536 : 25 - 43