Comparison of Risk Models in the Prediction of 30-Day Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Associated Cardiogenic Shock

被引:3
|
作者
Ranard, Lauren S. [1 ]
Guber, Kenneth [2 ]
Fried, Justin [1 ]
Takeda, Koji [1 ]
Kaku, Yuji [1 ]
Karmpaliotis, Dimitrios [1 ,3 ]
Sayer, Gabriel [1 ]
Rabbani, Leroy [1 ]
Burkhoff, Daniel [4 ]
Uriel, Nir [1 ]
Kirtane, Ajay J. [1 ,4 ]
Masoumi, Amirali [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Morristown Med Ctr, Gagnon Cardiovasc Inst, Morristown, NJ USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
来源
关键词
Acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock; Cardiogenic shock; Mortality; Risk prediction; Risk calculator; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; APACHE-II; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY; SAPS-II; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; SCORE; SEVERITY; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2022.100116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There are numerous risk-prediction models applied to acute myocardial infarction-related cardio-genic shock (AMI-CS) patients to determine a more accurate prognosis and to assist in patient triage. There is wide heterogeneity among the risk models including the nature of predictors evaluated and their specific outcome measures. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the performance of 20 risk-prediction models in AMI-CS patients. Methods: Patients included in our analysis were admitted to a tertiary care cardiac intensive care unit with AMI-CS. Twenty risk-prediction models were computed utilizing vitals assessments, laboratory investigations, hemo-dynamic markers, and vasopressor, inotropic and mechanical circulatory support available from within the first 24 hours of presentation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the prediction of 30-day mortality. Calibration was assessed with a Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Seventy patients (median age 63 years, 67% male) were admitted between 2017 and 2021. The models' area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.49 to 0.79, with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score having the most optimal discrimination of 30-day mortality (AUC: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.90), fol-lowed by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III score (AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80). All 20 risk scores demonstrated adequate calibration (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Among the models tested in a data set of patients admitted with AMI-CS, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II risk score model demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy. Further investigations are required to improve the discriminative capabilities of these models or to establish new, more streamlined and accurate methods for mortality prognostication in AMI-CS.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk of 30-Day Myocardial Infarction and Mortality after Vascular Surgery
    Huseynova, Khumara
    Conway, Baqiyyah
    DIABETES, 2017, 66 : A110 - A110
  • [22] Comparison of management and 30-day mortality of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women in Estonia
    Bakler, T
    Baburin, A
    Teesalu, R
    Rahu, M
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2004, 59 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [23] Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Matched-Pair IABP-SHOCK II Trial 30-Day Mortality Analysis
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Ibrahim, Karim
    Loehn, Tobias
    Werner, Nikos
    Sinning, Jan-Malte
    Pappalardo, Federico
    Pieri, Marina
    Skurk, Carsten
    Lauten, Alexander
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Horn, Patrick
    Pauschinger, Matthias
    Eckner, Dennis
    Twerenbold, Raphael
    Nordbeck, Peter
    Salinger, Tim
    Abel, Peter
    Empen, Klaus
    Busch, Mathias C.
    Felix, Stephan B.
    Sieweke, Jan-Thorben
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Pareek, Nilesh
    Hill, Jonathan
    MacCarthy, Philip
    Bergmann, Martin W.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Moebius-Winkler, Sven
    Schulze, P. Christian
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Schneider, Steffen
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Thiele, Holger
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Westermann, Dirk
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 139 (10) : 1249 - 1258
  • [24] A new 30-day mortality risk score system for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction
    Zhao, Yusheng
    Yang, Xuedong
    Wu, Xingli
    Xue, Qiao
    Gao, Lei
    Wang, Shiwen
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (19) : E793 - E793
  • [25] A NEW 30-DAY MORTALITY RISK SCORE SYSTEM FOR PATIENTS HOSPITALISED WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Zhao Yusheng
    Xu Qiang
    Wu Xingli
    Xue Qiao
    Gao Lei
    Wang Shiwen
    HEART, 2010, 96 : A138 - A138
  • [26] Defining refractory myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock: An ongoing elusive challenge
    Megarbane, Bruno
    Voicu, Sebastian
    Deye, Nicolas
    Baud, Frederic J.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) : 422 - 422
  • [27] Medical Comorbidity as a Predictor of 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Zhao, Yusheng
    Li, Xiaoying
    Wu, Xingli
    Xue, Qiao
    Gao, Lei
    Ma, Jing
    Xu, Qiang
    Wang, Shiwen
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (02) : E131 - E131
  • [28] Effect of intracoronary thrombectomy on 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Nakatani, Daisaku
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Sakata, Yasuhiko
    Mizuno, Hiroya
    Shimizu, Masahiko
    Suna, Shinichiro
    Nanto, Shinsuke
    Hirayama, Atsushi
    Ito, Hiroshi
    Fujii, Kenshi
    Hori, Masatsugu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 100 (08): : 1212 - 1217
  • [29] Critical access hospital conversion and 30-day mortality for acute myocardial infarction
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Wang, Yun
    Normand, Sharon-Lise T.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Keenan, Patricia S.
    Drye, Elizabeth E.
    Bhat, Kanchana R.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (21) : E425 - E425
  • [30] Quality of Care and 30-day Mortality of Women and Men With Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Araujo, Carla
    Laszczynska, Olga
    Viana, Marta
    Dias, Paula
    Maciel, Maria Julia
    Moreira, Ilidio
    Azevedo, Ana
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 72 (07): : 543 - 552