The application of proportional hazards and frailty models to multistage processes surveillance

被引:5
|
作者
Asadzadeh, Shervin [1 ]
Aghaie, Abdollah [2 ]
Shahriari, Hamid [2 ]
Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran 1999143344, Iran
[3] Sharif Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Multistage processes; Cascade property; Cox proportional hazard (PH) models; Frailty models; Cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart; Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control chart; SELECTING CONTROL CHARTS; DEPENDENT PROCESS STEPS; MONITORING PROCESSES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-014-5914-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Monitoring industrial and service processes with the purpose of improving the product reliability has been largely addressed in the literature. The surveillance procedures have been proposed with the concentration on single-stage processes with independent quality characteristics. However, the cascade property in multistage processes entails specific monitoring methods which take into account the dependency structure among quality variables in successive stages of a process. This is referred to as regression-adjustment that justifies the heterogeneity in the study population and thus leads to optimal monitoring of multistage processes. In general, it is not straightforward to adjust a quality variable for the effect of all influential covariates because measuring such covariates requires great financial cost and time effort or possibly one may have no prior information about such values. However, ignoring such covariates introduces unobserved heterogeneity which diminishes the detection power of a monitoring scheme. Moreover, the existence of a censoring mechanism results in having more complicated picture due to the inaccurate recording of some data. As a result, the proportional hazards and the frailty models are used to effectively account for both the observed and unobserved heterogeneity. Several monitoring procedures are devised which enable to justify the censoring issue as well. The comparison of the procedures reveals that the cumulative sum (CUSUM) control chart outweighs the competing counterparts.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 470
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ANALYZING SOCIAL PROCESSES - LIFE-TABLES AND PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS
    TEACHMAN, JD
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 1983, 12 (03) : 263 - 301
  • [22] Non-proportional hazards model with a PVF frailty term: application with a melanoma dataset
    Rosa, Karen C.
    Calsavara, Vinicius F.
    Louzada, Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2024,
  • [23] PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS OF GRADUATION
    Chimka, Justin
    Reed-Rhoads, Teri
    Barker, Kash
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT RETENTION-RESEARCH THEORY & PRACTICE, 2007, 9 (02) : 221 - 232
  • [24] Conditional proportional hazards models
    Arnold, BC
    Kim, YH
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA: MODELS IN RELIABILITY AND SURVIVAL ANALYSIS, 1996, : 21 - 28
  • [25] Checking for the gamma frailty distribution under the marginal proportional hazards frailty model
    Cui, SF
    Sun, YQ
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 2004, 14 (01) : 249 - 267
  • [26] Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models: an application in influenza
    Patel, Katie
    Kay, Richard
    Rowell, Lucy
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 5 (03) : 213 - 224
  • [27] The ROC of Cox proportional hazards cure models with application in cancer studies
    Yilong Zhang
    Xiaoxia Han
    Yongzhao Shao
    [J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 2021, 27 : 195 - 215
  • [28] The ROC of Cox proportional hazards cure models with application in cancer studies
    Zhang, Yilong
    Han, Xiaoxia
    Shao, Yongzhao
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2021, 27 (02) : 195 - 215
  • [29] Proportional reversed hazard and frailty models
    Sankaran, P. G.
    Gleeja, V. L.
    [J]. METRIKA, 2008, 68 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [30] Proportional reversed hazard and frailty models
    P. G. Sankaran
    V. L. Gleeja
    [J]. Metrika, 2008, 68 : 333 - 342