Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method

被引:77
|
作者
Zhang, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Newton, Sidney [3 ]
Fang, Jian-xin [4 ]
Zhou, De-qun [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lu-ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ New S Wales, Fac Built Environm, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Ecole Cent De Lille, Ctr Rech Informat Signal & Automat, F-59651 Villeneuve, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Choquet integral; Clean energy; Fuzzy measure; MCDM (multi-criteria decision making); RENEWABLE ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FUZZY INTEGRALS; POLICY; PROVINCE; CHOQUET; TECHNOLOGY; EMPLOYMENT; STRATEGIES; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.124
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Promoting the utilization of clean energy has been identified as one potential solution to addressing environmental pollution and achieving sustainable development in many countries around the world. Evaluating clean energy alternatives includes a requirement to balance multiple conflict criteria, including technology, environment, economy and society, all of which are incommensurate and interdependent. Traditional MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) methods, such as the weighted average method, often fail to aggregate such criteria consistently. In this paper, an improved MCDM method based on fuzzy measure and integral is developed and applied to evaluate four primary clean energy options for Jiangsu Province, China. The results confirm that the preferred clean energy option for Jiangsu is solar photovoltaic, followed by wind, biomass and finally nuclear. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to evaluate the values of clean energy resources for Jiangsu. The ordered weighted average method is also applied to compare the method mentioned above in our empirical study. The results show that the improved MCDM method provides higher discrimination between alternative clean energy alternatives. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 964
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating Government Websites Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Buyukozkan, Guelcin
    [J]. 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 190 - 199
  • [32] Evaluating the sustainability of hotels using multi-criteria decision making methods
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Hoang-Phu Nguyen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 175 (03) : 129 - 140
  • [33] Managing changes in alternatives and criteria during a dynamic multi-criteria group decision making process
    Morente-Molinera, J. A.
    Cabrerizo, Lj
    Alonso, S.
    Perez, I. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    [J]. 2020 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT'20), VOL 1, 2020, : 1 - 6
  • [34] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Procedure for the Analysis of an Energy System
    Ming-Shan Zhu Bu-Xuan Wang Yun-Han Xiao Department of Thermal Engineering
    [J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 1992, (04) : 221 - 225
  • [35] The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery
    Hancerliogullari, Gulsah
    Hancerliogullari, Kadir Oymen
    Koksalmis, Emrah
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 17 : 1 - 13
  • [36] Evaluating the service quality of airports in Thailand using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method
    Pandey, Mukesh Mohan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 : 241 - 249
  • [37] The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery
    Gulsah Hancerliogullari
    Kadir Oymen Hancerliogullari
    Emrah Koksalmis
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17
  • [38] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [39] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [40] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423