Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: An improved multi-criteria decision making method

被引:77
|
作者
Zhang, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Newton, Sidney [3 ]
Fang, Jian-xin [4 ]
Zhou, De-qun [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lu-ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ New S Wales, Fac Built Environm, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Ecole Cent De Lille, Ctr Rech Informat Signal & Automat, F-59651 Villeneuve, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Choquet integral; Clean energy; Fuzzy measure; MCDM (multi-criteria decision making); RENEWABLE ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; FUZZY INTEGRALS; POLICY; PROVINCE; CHOQUET; TECHNOLOGY; EMPLOYMENT; STRATEGIES; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.124
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Promoting the utilization of clean energy has been identified as one potential solution to addressing environmental pollution and achieving sustainable development in many countries around the world. Evaluating clean energy alternatives includes a requirement to balance multiple conflict criteria, including technology, environment, economy and society, all of which are incommensurate and interdependent. Traditional MCDM (multi-criteria decision making) methods, such as the weighted average method, often fail to aggregate such criteria consistently. In this paper, an improved MCDM method based on fuzzy measure and integral is developed and applied to evaluate four primary clean energy options for Jiangsu Province, China. The results confirm that the preferred clean energy option for Jiangsu is solar photovoltaic, followed by wind, biomass and finally nuclear. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted to evaluate the values of clean energy resources for Jiangsu. The ordered weighted average method is also applied to compare the method mentioned above in our empirical study. The results show that the improved MCDM method provides higher discrimination between alternative clean energy alternatives. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:953 / 964
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Improved CURLI Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Nguyen, Anh-Tu
    [J]. ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (01) : 10121 - 10127
  • [2] A Method for Multi-criteria Decision Making with Linguistic Preference Information on Criteria and Alternatives
    Li, Quan
    [J]. 2008 ISECS INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 260 - 264
  • [3] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [4] Evaluation of River Water Transfer Alternatives with the TODIM Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh
    Parvin Golfam
    Hugo A. Loáiciga
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 4847 - 4863
  • [5] A Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Kharal, Athar
    [J]. NEW MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL COMPUTATION, 2014, 10 (02) : 143 - 162
  • [6] Evaluation of River Water Transfer Alternatives with the TODIM Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat
    Golfam, Parvin
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (15) : 4847 - 4863
  • [7] Energy simulation in buildings with the help of multi-criteria decision making method
    Medineckiene, Milena
    Dziugaite-Tumeniene, Rasa
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (9TH ICEE) - SELECTED PAPERS, 2014,
  • [8] Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2018, 29 (02) : 265 - 280
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Alternative Energy Sources in China
    Xue, Xiangwen
    Zhang, Qi
    Cai, Xinyu
    Ponkratov, Vadim V.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision making method based on Improved ELECTRE III model
    Sun Zhaoxu
    Han Min
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ICETMS 2013), 2013, : 548 - 550