Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial

被引:46
|
作者
Glavind, J. [1 ]
Kindberg, S. F. [1 ]
Uldbjerg, N. [1 ]
Khalil, M. [2 ]
Moller, A. M. [3 ]
Mortensen, B. B. [4 ]
Rasmussen, O. B. [5 ]
Christensen, J. T. [6 ]
Jorgensen, J. S. [7 ]
Henriksen, T. B. [8 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Kolding Cty Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Reg Hosp Viborg, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Viborg, Denmark
[5] Reg Hosp Randers, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Randers, Denmark
[6] Reg Hosp Herning, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Herning, Denmark
[7] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[8] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
关键词
Elective caesarean section; maternal outcomes; neonatal intensive care unit admission; neonatal outcomes; timing; RESPIRATORY MORBIDITY; TERM INFANTS; DELIVERY; RISK; MODE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.12278
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate whether elective caesarean section before 39 completed weeks of gestation increases the risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes. Design Randomised controlled multicentre open-label trial. Setting Seven Danish tertiary hospitals from March 2009 to June 2011. Population Women with uncomplicated pregnancies, a single fetus, and a date of delivery estimated by ultrasound scheduled for delivery by elective caesarean section. Methods Perinatal outcomes after elective caesarean section scheduled at a gestational age of 38weeks and 3days versus 39weeks and 3days (in both groups +/- 2days). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within 48hours of birth. Secondary outcomes were neonatal depression, NICU admission within 7days, NICU length of stay, neonatal treatment, and maternal surgical or postpartum adverse events. Results Among women scheduled for elective caesarean section at 38(+3)weeks 88/635 neonates (13.9%) were admitted to the NICU, whereas in the 39(+3)weeks group 76/637 neonates (11.9%) were admitted (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.65-1.15). Neonatal treatment with continuous oxygen for more than 1day (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10-0.94) and maternal bleeding of more than 500ml (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99) were less frequent in the 39weeks group, but these findings were insignificant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The risk of adverse neonatal or maternal outcomes, or a maternal composite outcome (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.79-1.53) was similar in the two intervention groups. Conclusions This study found no significant reduction in neonatal admission rate after ECS scheduled at 39weeks compared with 38weeks of gestation.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1132
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elective ceasarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial
    Glavind, J.
    Henriksen, T. B.
    Kindberg, S. F.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (13) : 1748 - 1749
  • [2] Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial Reply
    Glavind, J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (13) : 1703 - 1704
  • [3] Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial Are we trivialising neonatal intensive care unit admissions?
    Amorim, M. M.
    Nakamura-Pereira, M.
    Takemoto, M. L. S.
    Knobel, R.
    Katz, L.
    Andreucci, C. B.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (13) : 1702 - 1703
  • [4] Pilot randomised controlled trial comparing the risk of neonatal respiratory distress in elective caesarean section at 38 weeks' gestation following a course of corticosteroids versus caesarean at 39 weeks
    Sananes, Nicolas
    Koch, Antoine
    Escande, Benoit
    Aissi, Germain
    Fritz, Gabrielle
    Roth, Emmanuel
    Weil, Michele
    Bakri, Ahmad
    Bolender, Chantal
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Gaudineau, Adrien
    Nisand, Israel
    Favre, Romain
    Kuhn, Pierre
    Langer, Bruno
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 212 : 54 - 59
  • [5] ‘Elective caesarean section at 38–39 weeks gestation compared to > 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study
    Reihaneh Pirjani
    Motahareh Afrakhteh
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Shahin Nariman
    Mahboobeh Shirazi
    Ashraf Moini
    Ladan Hosseini
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [6] 'Elective caesarean section at 38-39 weeks gestation compared to > 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study
    Pirjani, Reihaneh
    Afrakhteh, Motahareh
    Sepidarkish, Mahdi
    Nariman, Shahin
    Shirazi, Mahboobeh
    Moini, Ashraf
    Hosseini, Ladan
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [7] Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks
    Glavind, Julie
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 27 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [8] Neonatal adverse outcome of elective caesarean section before 39 weeks of gestation
    Vieira Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli
    Zugaib, Marcelo
    [J]. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 59 (02): : 93 - 94
  • [9] Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: balance between the perceived benefits and potential drawbacks
    Sholapurkar, S. L.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (07) : 907 - 908
  • [10] COMPARISON OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL OUTCOME IN ELECTIVE REPEAT CAESAREAN SECTION DONE BEFORE 39 WEEKS AND THOSE DONE AT OR AFTER 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION
    Kusumam, V. N.
    Beevi, Naseema A.
    Couth, Smitha D.
    Ameen, Nurul A. M.
    Sreenivas, Smitha
    Sulochana, P. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (18): : 3071 - 3077