Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks

被引:13
|
作者
Glavind, Julie [1 ]
Uldbjerg, Niels [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Hosp Randers, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-8930 Randers, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
early term; elective cesarean delivery; gestational age; maternal morbidity; neonatal morbidity; EARLY-TERM; RESPIRATORY MORBIDITY; SECTION; OUTCOMES; GESTATION;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0000000000000158
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review The purpose of this article is to critically review the existing literature with regard to neonatal and maternal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery at 38 completed weeks versus 39 completed weeks of gestation. Recent findings Recent observational studies have consolidated previous findings of an increased risk of neonatal composite morbidity, respiratory morbidity, and neonatal admission with elective cesarean delivery at 38 compared with 39 weeks of gestation. In opposition, results from the first randomized trial were recently reported in which there was no significant difference in the risk of neonatal admission with elective cesarean delivery at the two gestational weeks. In the mothers, the risk of adverse outcomes is similar with elective cesarean delivery at 38 or 39 weeks. Though evidence of long-term adverse effects of early-term delivery (primarily spontaneous and vaginally) is accumulating, no data exist to elucidate whether these findings apply to children electively delivered by cesarean section. Summary Neonatal but not maternal adverse events are more frequent with elective cesarean delivery performed at 38 than 39 weeks' gestation. The difference, however, may be significantly smaller than previously anticipated. Further prospective studies, including investigations with focus on the impact of labor onset prior to cesarean delivery, are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 127
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is 38 weeks late enough for elective cesarean delivery?
    Matsuo, K.
    Komoto, Y.
    Kimura, T.
    Shimoya, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 100 (01) : 90 - 91
  • [2] Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial
    Glavind, J.
    Kindberg, S. F.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    Khalil, M.
    Moller, A. M.
    Mortensen, B. B.
    Rasmussen, O. B.
    Christensen, J. T.
    Jorgensen, J. S.
    Henriksen, T. B.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (09) : 1123 - 1132
  • [3] Elective ceasarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial
    Glavind, J.
    Henriksen, T. B.
    Kindberg, S. F.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (13) : 1748 - 1749
  • [4] The impact of guidelines limiting elective delivery prior to 39 weeks on rates of elective induction and cesarean delivery
    Ehrenthal, Deborah
    Hoffman, Matthew
    Ostrum, Gordon
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S221 - S222
  • [5] Elective cesarean delivery at 38 weeks' gestation: Is the timing too early?
    Matsuo, Koji
    Shimoya, Koichiro
    Kimura, Tadashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (05) : 569 - 569
  • [6] Does maternal age moderate the relationship between elective induction of labor at 39 weeks and primary cesarean delivery?
    Darney, Blair
    Snowden, Jonathan
    Dublin, Sascha
    Nicholson, James
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Getahun, Darios
    Cheng, Yvonne
    Caughey, Aaron
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S313 - S314
  • [7] ‘Elective caesarean section at 38–39 weeks gestation compared to > 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study
    Reihaneh Pirjani
    Motahareh Afrakhteh
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Shahin Nariman
    Mahboobeh Shirazi
    Ashraf Moini
    Ladan Hosseini
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [8] Maternal race and neonatal outcomes after elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Vilchez, Gustavo
    Chelliah, Anushka
    Argoti, Pedro
    Jeelani, Roohi
    Bahado-Singh, Ray
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (04): : 368 - 371
  • [9] Elective caesarean section at 38 versus 39 weeks of gestation: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial Reply
    Glavind, J.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (13) : 1703 - 1704
  • [10] Elective Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request
    Ecker, Jeffrey
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (18): : 1930 - 1936