Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies

被引:629
|
作者
Evans, Annette [1 ]
Strezov, Vladimir [1 ]
Evans, Tim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Grad Sch Environm, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
来源
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2009年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
Renewable energy; Sustainability; Emissions; Price; Social impacts; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GEOTHERMAL POWER-GENERATION; PAY-BACK TIME; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; NUCLEAR-POWER; GHG EMISSIONS; SOLAR POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The non-combustion based renewable electricity generation technologies were assessed against a range of sustainability indicators and using data obtained from the literature. The indicators used to assess each technology were price of generated electricity, greenhouse gas emissions during full life cycle of the technology, availability of renewable sources, efficiency of energy conversion, land requirements, water consumption and social impacts, The cost of electricity, greenhouse gas emissions and the efficiency of electricity generation were found to have a very wide range for each technology, mainly due to variations in technological options as well as geographical dependence of each renewable energy source. The social impacts were assessed qualitatively based on the major individual impacts discussed in literature. Renewable energy technologies were then ranked against each indicator assuming that indicators have equal importance for sustainable development. It was found that wind power is the most sustainable, followed by hydropower, photovoltaic and then geothermal. Wind power was identified with the lowest relative greenhouse gas emissions, the least water consumption demands and with the most favourable social impacts comparing to other technologies, but requires larger land and has high relative capital costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1088
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Integrated sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy technologies: A literature review and a new proposal of sustainability indicators for Mexico
    Solano-Olivares, K.
    Santoyo, E.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 192
  • [12] Algerian renewable energy assessment: The challenge of sustainability
    Stambouli, Amine Boudghene
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (08) : 4507 - 4519
  • [13] Renewable Energy Sources of Turkey and Assessment of Sustainability
    Erdil, Aysenur
    Erbiyik, Hikmet
    11TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2015, 207 : 669 - 679
  • [14] Indicators To Determine Winning Renewable Energy Technologies with an Application to Photovoltaics
    Grossmann, Wolf D.
    Grossmann, Iris
    Steininger, Karl
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (13) : 4849 - 4855
  • [15] The International Conference on Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability
    Salame, Chafic
    Aillerie, Michel
    Papageorgas, Panagiotis
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY -TMREES15, 2015, 74 : 1 - 3
  • [16] Evaluation of the Pavement Geothermal Energy Harvesting Technologies towards Sustainability and Renewable Energy
    Al-Qadami, Ebrahim Hamid Hussein
    Mustaffa, Zahiraniza
    Al-Atroush, Mohamed E.
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [17] Socioeconomic indicators and their influence on the adoption of renewable energy technologies in rural Malawi
    Nkhoma, Richard
    Mwale, Vincent Dodoma
    Ngonda, Tiyamike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2024, 18 (06) : 1870 - 1884
  • [18] Prospective assessment of energy technologies: a comprehensive approach for sustainability assessment
    Haase, M.
    Wulf, C.
    Baumann, M.
    Roesch, C.
    Weil, M.
    Zapp, P.
    Naegler, T.
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [19] Prospective assessment of energy technologies: a comprehensive approach for sustainability assessment
    M. Haase
    C. Wulf
    M. Baumann
    C. Rösch
    M. Weil
    P. Zapp
    T. Naegler
    Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12
  • [20] Harvesting sustainability: vertical agricultural greenhouses powered by renewable energy technologies
    Lachheb, Aymen
    Skouri, Safa
    Ayed, Rabeb
    Bekkouche, Sidi Mohammed El Amine
    Bouadila, Salwa
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) : 4688 - 4703