Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies

被引:618
|
作者
Evans, Annette [1 ]
Strezov, Vladimir [1 ]
Evans, Tim J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Grad Sch Environm, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
来源
关键词
Renewable energy; Sustainability; Emissions; Price; Social impacts; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GEOTHERMAL POWER-GENERATION; PAY-BACK TIME; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; NUCLEAR-POWER; GHG EMISSIONS; SOLAR POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The non-combustion based renewable electricity generation technologies were assessed against a range of sustainability indicators and using data obtained from the literature. The indicators used to assess each technology were price of generated electricity, greenhouse gas emissions during full life cycle of the technology, availability of renewable sources, efficiency of energy conversion, land requirements, water consumption and social impacts, The cost of electricity, greenhouse gas emissions and the efficiency of electricity generation were found to have a very wide range for each technology, mainly due to variations in technological options as well as geographical dependence of each renewable energy source. The social impacts were assessed qualitatively based on the major individual impacts discussed in literature. Renewable energy technologies were then ranked against each indicator assuming that indicators have equal importance for sustainable development. It was found that wind power is the most sustainable, followed by hydropower, photovoltaic and then geothermal. Wind power was identified with the lowest relative greenhouse gas emissions, the least water consumption demands and with the most favourable social impacts comparing to other technologies, but requires larger land and has high relative capital costs. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1082 / 1088
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Technologies
    Wright, Joseph M.
    Zheng, Zhenqing
    Caudill, Reggie J.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2012,
  • [2] Technologies and Materials for Renewable Energy, Environment and Sustainability
    Michel, Aillerie
    Panagiotis, Papageorgas
    Chafic-Touma, Salame
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, TMREES17, 2017, 119 : 1 - 2
  • [3] Technologies and materials for renewable energy, environment and sustainability
    Salame, Chafic-Touma
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 1 - 3
  • [4] Renewable Energy Perspective for Turkey Using Sustainability Indicators
    Burcu Kuleli Pak
    Yildiz E. Albayrak
    Yasemin C. Erensal
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 (1) : 187 - 197
  • [5] Renewable Energy Perspective for Turkey Using Sustainability Indicators
    Pak, Burcu Kuleli
    Albayrak, Yildiz E.
    Erensal, Yasemin C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (01) : 187 - 197
  • [6] Sustainability assessment of renewable power and heat generation technologies
    Dombi, Mihaly
    Kuti, Istvan
    Balogh, Peter
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 : 264 - 271
  • [7] Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators
    Afgan, NH
    Carvalho, MG
    Hovanov, NV
    ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) : 603 - 612
  • [8] Promoting sustainability of renewable energy technologies and renewable energy service companies in the Fiji Islands
    Chand, Denise
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION (ICSEEA) 2012, 2013, 32 : 55 - 63
  • [9] The role of sustainability characteristics in the diffusion of renewable energy technologies
    Aponte, Fabian Rocha
    Wiebe, Kirsten S.
    Luttikhuis, Nikki
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 57
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: Results of a survey among European energy experts
    Carrera, Diana Gallego
    Mack, Alexander
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (02) : 1030 - 1039