A Comparative Study of Cartesian and Delta 3D Printers on Producing PLA Parts

被引:13
|
作者
Schmitt, Betina Madeira [1 ]
Zirbes, Christiano Fraga [1 ]
Bonin, Cassiano [1 ]
Lohmann, Daniel [2 ]
Lencina, Diovani Castoldi [1 ]
Sabino Netto, Aurelio da Costa [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Fed Santa Catarina, Grp Pesquisa Proc Fabricacao & Tecnol Mat PFBMAT, Ave Mauro Ramos 950, BR-88020300 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Inst Fed Santa Catarina, Grp Automacao Aplicada GRA, Ave Mauro Ramos 950, BR-88020300 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
3D printing; Cartesian Printer; Delta Printer; Dimensional Evaluation; Surface quality;
D O I
10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-1039
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The additive manufacturing processes emerged at the end of the last century and became popular by low-cost 3D printers. The most used printers work on a cartesian configuration, but recently were launched delta machines. These 3D printers use a more complex control system due to their trajectories generation but may present some advantages over the cartesian configuration. To increase the knowledge about additive manufacturing, a comparative study with cartesian and delta printers was performed to evaluate the performance on printing a testing part. Three samples were produced in each printer and compared based on surface quality, manufacturing time, mass and dimensional measurement. The printed objects were 3D scanned for comparing the digitized geometry by aligning the point cloud generated to its virtual 3D model. The parts produced in delta printer obtained better surface quality, while cartesian printer provided better dimensional accuracy. The results also showed that the variation of the mass and time to produce the parts were not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 886
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NEW MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITH 3D PRINTERS, COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Valiente Lopez, M.
    Moyano Sanz, S.
    Sanz Contreras, M. C.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 6607 - 6616
  • [2] Execution of Plastic Parts Using 3D Scanners and 3D Printers
    Bucuresteanu, Anca
    Prodan, Dan
    Motomancea, Adrian
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2018, 55 (02) : 215 - 218
  • [3] Comparative study of vibration signatures of FDM 3D printers
    Roshan Mishra
    William Benjamin Powers
    Kunal Kate
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2023, 8 : 205 - 209
  • [4] Comparative study of vibration signatures of FDM 3D printers
    Mishra, Roshan
    Powers, William Benjamin
    Kate, Kunal
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 8 (02) : 205 - 209
  • [6] Evaluation of the Circularity of Recycled PLA Filaments for 3D Printers
    Gil Munoz, Victor
    Muneta, Luisa M.
    Carrasco-Gallego, Ruth
    de Juanes Marquez, Juan
    Hidalgo-Carvajal, David
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 12
  • [7] MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF BIODEGRADABLE PLA MATERIAL FOR 3D PRINTERS
    Beniak, Juraj
    Krizan, Peter
    Matus, Milos
    ENERGY AND CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL I, 2016, : 481 - 487
  • [8] 3D Printers That Make Medical Parts Should be Regulated
    Siblani, Al
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2017, 158 (06): : 14 - 14
  • [9] THE PROBLEMS OF INDUSTRIAL 3D ABS AND PLA PRINTERS IN CERMISO CENTER
    Ionut G.S.
    Stefan N.C.
    Dorin A.
    Mihai T.
    Mirela C.A.
    International Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 2022 (11): : 137 - 140
  • [10] Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Mangano, Francesco G.
    Admakin, Oleg
    Bonacina, Matteo
    Biaggini, Francesco
    Farronato, Davide
    Lerner, Henriette
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 28 (02): : 75 - 85