Intramammary infection rate during the dry period in cows that received blanket dry cow therapy: efficacy of 6 different dry-cow intra-mammary antimicrobial products

被引:0
|
作者
Petzer, I-M [1 ]
Lourens, D. C. [1 ]
van der Schans, T. J. [1 ]
Watermeyer, J. C. [1 ]
van Reenen, R. [1 ]
Rautenbach, G. H. [1 ]
Thompson, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Fac Vet Sci, Dept Prod Anim Studies, ZA-0110 Onderstepoort, South Africa
关键词
comparative study; cure rates; dairy cow therapy; new intramammary infections; product efficacy; MAJOR MASTITIS PATHOGENS; BOVINE MAMMARY-GLAND; SOMATIC-CELL COUNTS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; CLINICAL MASTITIS; MILK-PRODUCTION; DAIRY-COWS; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; LACTATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of 6 different dry-cow intramammary antimicrobial products for the treatment and prevention of mastitis during the dry period in a well-managed high producing Friesland dairy herd, and the influence of treatment on the somatic cell count (SCC) of cows during early lactation. One of 6 dry-cow intramammary antimicrobial products was randomly allocated to 162 cows due for drying off over a period of 14 months. All cows were sampled twice prior to drying off, and twice after calving for the determination of SCC and presence of microorganisms. The quarter prevalence of pathogens at drying off and post-calving, the overall quarter cure rate and the rate of new intramammary infections occurring during the dry period were determined. The overall quarter prevalence of intramammary infections (IMIs) at drying off was 29.78 % and after calving 22.22 %. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the prevalence of major and minor pathogens at drying off (7.87 % and 21.91%) and at calving (4.47 % and 17.75 %). The most prevalent pathogens isolated at drying off (21.14 %) and at calving (16.98 %) were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). The quarter cure rate during the dry period was 83.94 %. The cure rate for the major pathogens (98 %) was significantly better (P < 0.05) than that for minor pathogens (78.9 %). The overall quarter cure rate varied from 72.3 % to 93.9 % for the various products. The rate of new quarter infections during the dry period was 17.44 % with a significant difference (P < 0.05), between the prevalence of new quarter infections with major(4.32 %) and minor pathogens (13.12 %). CNS was the most prevalent pathogen causing new quarter infections (12.34 %) and the rate of new quarter infections varied from 13.4 % to 24.1 % for the various products. It is concluded that there is a difference in efficacy between antimicrobial intramammary dry-cow products in their ability to cure and prevent new IMIs during the dry period. Dry-cow products are mainly formulated for efficacy against Gram-positive cocci, while providing no or little protection against Gram-negative bacteria. Therapeutic levels may persist for only 14 to 28 days into the dry period and fail to protect the udder during the last trimester. Dry-cow therapy should, however, always form part of a holistic approach to the dry period which also considers cow factors, dry-cow management, microorganisms and the environment of the dry cow.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 30
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The prediction of dry period intra-mammary infection status from historical cow records
    Henderson, A.
    Hudson, C.
    Bradley, A.
    Sherwin, G.
    Green, M.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2015, 23 : 213 - 214
  • [2] Changes in mammary infection status in dairy cows during the dry period using dry cow therapy approaches on three farms
    Nagahata, Hajime
    Komori, Nodoka
    Fukutome, Mayu
    Sugiura, Tomochika
    Hisaeda, Keiichi
    Gondaira, Satoshi
    Higuchi, Hidetoshi
    Ando, Tatsuya
    Nakada, Ken
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 95 (01)
  • [3] Effect of selective dry cow therapy on dry period intramammary infection dynamics and their association with management factors in Japan
    Huang, Che-Hsuan
    Fujihara, Ikuho
    Kusaba, Nobuyuki
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2022, 93 (01)
  • [4] The effect of dry cow therapy and internal teat-sealant on intra-mammary infections during subsequent lactation
    Bhutto, A. L.
    Murray, R. D.
    Woldehiwet, Z.
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2011, 90 (02) : 316 - 320
  • [5] An investigation of three approaches to dry cow therapy to prevent intramammary infection in the dry period and clinical mastitis in early lactation
    Bradley, A. J.
    Breen, J. E.
    Green, M. J.
    MASTITIS CONTROL: FROM SCIENCE TO PRACTICE, 2008, : 317 - 317
  • [6] Risk factors for new intramammary infections during the dry period in untreated dairy cows from herds using selective dry cow therapy
    Robert, A.
    Rousse, P.
    Bareille, N.
    Ribaud, D.
    Serieys, F.
    Heuche, V.
    Seegers, H.
    ANIMAL, 2008, 2 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [7] The comparative efficacy of two long-acting dry-cow cephalonium products in curing and preventing intramammary infections
    Bryan, M. A.
    Heuer, C.
    Emslie, F. R.
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 59 (04) : 166 - 173
  • [8] Effect of different scenarios for selective dry-cow therapy on udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics
    Scherpenzeel, C. G. M.
    den Uiji, I. E. M.
    van Schaik, G.
    Riekerink, R. G. M. Olde
    Hogeveen, H.
    Lam, T. J. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (05) : 3753 - 3764
  • [9] Efficacy of an internal teat seal associated with a dry cow intramammary antibiotic for prevention of intramammary infections in dairy cows during the dry and early lactation periods
    Molina, Livio R.
    Costa, Hudson. N.
    Leao, Juliana M.
    Malacco, Victor M. R.
    Facury Filho, Elias J.
    Carvalho, Antonio U.
    Lage, Camila F. A.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 37 (05): : 465 - 470
  • [10] Comparative efficacy of blanket versus selective dry-cow therapy: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis
    Winder, C. B.
    Sargeant, J. M.
    Kelton, D. F.
    Leblanc, S. J.
    Duffield, T. F.
    Glanville, J.
    Wood, H.
    Churchill, K. J.
    Dunn, J.
    Bergevin, M. d.
    Dawkins, K.
    Meadows, S.
    O'Connor, A. M.
    ANIMAL HEALTH RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2019, 20 (02) : 217 - 228