Regional contingency planning using the OSCAR oil spill contingency and response model

被引:0
|
作者
Aamo, OM [1 ]
Reed, M [1 ]
Lewis, A [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Appl Chem, Environm Engn, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Oil spill contingency planning requires the quantitative comparison of alternative response options so that the most appropriate, effective and/or cost-effective option can be recommended. A model system for Oil Spill Contingency and Response (OSCAR) has been used to evaluate first line oil spill response strategies for different fields in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The system consists of a three-dimensional numerical model of the physical and chemical behavior and fate of spilled oil, and an oil spill response simulation of various currently available mechanical recovery and dispersant application systems. By providing a quantitative and more objective assessment of response performance, the response can be dimensioned based on physical or biological criteria set for the region in question. The cost, effectiveness (as defined on the basis of various criteria) and environmental benefit of various options can be compared. The paper demonstrates how weathering studies combined with modelling of probable spill scenarios can be used to develop relevant, site-specific contingency plans. The effect of oil type, spill size and release conditions on response performance is clearly demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] OIL SHOCKS, MARKET RESPONSE, AND CONTINGENCY PLANNING - HORWICH,G, WEIMER,DL
    HEFFER, J
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ETUDES AMERICAINES, 1985, (23): : 146 - 147
  • [43] Prevention of hydrocarbons sea pollution: Sensitivity Index Maps for the Venice Lagoon as integral component of oil-spill contingency planning and response
    Cinquepalmi, F
    Schiuma, D
    Tagliapietra, D
    Benedetti, C
    Zitelli, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL COASTAL REGIONS, 1998, : 197 - 207
  • [44] Decision making of oil spill contingency options with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
    Liu, X.
    Wirtz, K. W.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (04) : 663 - 676
  • [45] Consensus oriented fuzzified decision support for oil spill contingency management
    Liu, Xin
    Wirtz, Kai W.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 134 (1-3) : 27 - 35
  • [46] Preliminary Study on Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plan System in China
    Mao, Ning
    Wang, Zhongdai
    MARITIME OIL SPILL RESPONSE, 2015, 3 : 59 - 65
  • [47] Decision making of oil spill contingency options with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
    X. Liu
    K. W. Wirtz
    Water Resources Management, 2007, 21 : 663 - 676
  • [48] OIL SPILL BOOM MODELING, NUMERICAL APPROXIMATION AND CONTINGENCY PLAN OPTIMIZATION
    Muttin, F.
    PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 5 (01): : 111 - 126
  • [49] Knowledge model for emergency response based on contingency planning system of China
    Ni, Zi-jian
    Rong, Lili
    Wang, Ning
    Cao, Shuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 46 : 10 - 22
  • [50] Legislative framework for national contingency planning and response
    Drobysz, S.
    Sherman, D. M.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2020, 39 (02): : 385 - 392