Efficacy and safety of low dose ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Wang, Yiwen [1 ]
Lu, Chi [1 ]
Xuan, Haochen [3 ]
Wang, Chaofan [3 ]
Li, Dongye [1 ]
Xu, Tongda [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Inst Cardiovasc Dis Res, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary heart disease; cardiology; adult cardiology; PLATELET INHIBITION; EAST ASIANS; CLOPIDOGREL; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PLATO; PHARMACOKINETICS; ADHERENCE; STRATEGY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Our aim was to examine clinical trials, provide guidance to practitioners and estimate the efficacy and safety of two agents by comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We systematically looked through Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data and CNKI for trials comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with ACS since the database was created. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary endpoint for safety was the rate of major bleeding events. We also evaluated platelet function between low dose ticagrelor and standard dose clopidogrel in ACS patients. From 6744 articles, 16 studies including 1629 patients met the inclusion criteria. In contrast with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). No difference was noted for major bleeding events (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.43, 3.08) between the two agents (p=0.77). In addition, low dose ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.53) (p<0.01). Platelet reaction units for low dose ticagrelor were much lower than those for standard dose clopidogrel (SMD -2.46, 95% CI -2.85 to -2.07) (p<0.01). In comparison with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly lowered the incidence of MACEs, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic dimension and did not expand the risk of major bleeding events or minor or minimal bleeding events in ACS patients with a considerable safety and efficacy profile. In addition, low dose ticagrelor was associated with dramatically lower platelet aggregation compared with standard dose clopidogrel.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:693 / 702
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real world outcomes for clopidogrel versus ticagrelor treated patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Sibbing, D.
    Paek, D.
    Del Aguila, M.
    Girotra, S.
    Cuisset, T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 2428 - 2428
  • [42] Ticagrelor for Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome in real-world practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Galimzhanov, Akhmetzhan Maratovich
    Azizov, Baurzhan Slymovich
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 71 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [43] Head to head comparison of Prasugrel versus Ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Pravesh Kumar Bundhun
    Jia-Xin Shi
    Feng Huang
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 18
  • [44] Switching to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Initially Treated With Prasugrel or Ticagrelor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hong, Jenny
    Turgeon, Ricky D.
    Pearson, Glen J.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2019, 53 (10) : 997 - 1004
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis
    Gelbenegger, Georg
    Schoergenhofer, Christian
    Jilma, Bernd
    Gager, Gloria M.
    Dizdarevic, Al Medina
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Parapid, Biljana
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    Siller-Matula, Jolanta M.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 110 (02) : 424 - 431
  • [46] Efficacy and Safety of PSCK9 Inhibitors on Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Zhao, Jiajing
    Tong, Xinyu
    Peng, Jian
    Lyu, Chuxin
    Lu, Shu
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (03)
  • [47] Safety and Efficacy of Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ullah, Waqas
    Gowda, Smitha Narayana
    Fischman, David
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 23 : 1 - 6
  • [48] Morphine in acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duarte, Goncalo Silva
    Nunes-Ferreira, Afonso
    Rodrigues, Filipe Brogueira
    Pinto, Fausto J.
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Costa, Joao
    Caldeira, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [49] Investigation of efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome
    Liu, Yang
    Liu, Heng-Liang
    Hao, Zhen-Xuan
    Chen, Qi
    Wang, Dan-Li
    Ji, Jin-Rui
    Liu, Jing
    Zhang, Sheng-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (01): : 1289 - 1298
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Wen-Wen
    Jiang, Juan
    Gao, Jie
    Zhang, Xiu-Zhen
    Li, Yuan-Min
    Liu, Yan-Lin
    Dang, He-Qin
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (03) : 296 - 303