Efficacy and safety of low dose ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Wang, Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Hao [2 ]
Wang, Yiwen [1 ]
Lu, Chi [1 ]
Xuan, Haochen [3 ]
Wang, Chaofan [3 ]
Li, Dongye [1 ]
Xu, Tongda [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Inst Cardiovasc Dis Res, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary heart disease; cardiology; adult cardiology; PLATELET INHIBITION; EAST ASIANS; CLOPIDOGREL; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PLATO; PHARMACOKINETICS; ADHERENCE; STRATEGY; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Our aim was to examine clinical trials, provide guidance to practitioners and estimate the efficacy and safety of two agents by comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We systematically looked through Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data and CNKI for trials comparing low dose ticagrelor with standard dose clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with ACS since the database was created. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). The primary endpoint for safety was the rate of major bleeding events. We also evaluated platelet function between low dose ticagrelor and standard dose clopidogrel in ACS patients. From 6744 articles, 16 studies including 1629 patients met the inclusion criteria. In contrast with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly reduced MACEs (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). No difference was noted for major bleeding events (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.43, 3.08) between the two agents (p=0.77). In addition, low dose ticagrelor showed lower platelet aggregation rate than clopidogrel (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.68, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.53) (p<0.01). Platelet reaction units for low dose ticagrelor were much lower than those for standard dose clopidogrel (SMD -2.46, 95% CI -2.85 to -2.07) (p<0.01). In comparison with standard dose clopidogrel, low dose ticagrelor significantly lowered the incidence of MACEs, improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic dimension and did not expand the risk of major bleeding events or minor or minimal bleeding events in ACS patients with a considerable safety and efficacy profile. In addition, low dose ticagrelor was associated with dramatically lower platelet aggregation compared with standard dose clopidogrel.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:693 / 702
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Xiangkai
    Zhang, Jian
    Guo, Jialin
    Wang, Jinxin
    Pan, Yuhui
    Zhao, Xue
    Sang, Wentao
    Yang, Kehui
    Xu, Fengyang
    Xu, Feng
    Chen, Yuguo
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [2] The clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of ticagrelor for acute coronary syndrome in general ACS patients and diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Qiutong
    Jiang, Xin
    Huang, Sichao
    Zhang, Tiantian
    Chen, Lin
    Xie, Siwen
    Mo, Enpan
    Xu, Jun
    Cai, Shaohui
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [3] Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shah, Rajendra P.
    Shafiq, Aimen
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Maniya, Muhammad Talha
    Duhan, Sanchit
    Keisham, Bijeta
    Patel, Bansari
    Alamzaib, Sardar Muhammad
    Yashi, Kanica
    Uppal, Dipan
    Sattar, Yasar
    Tiwari, Dinesh
    Paul, Timir K.
    AlJaroudi, Wael
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 207 : 206 - 214
  • [4] Comparison of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fong, Lucas Chun Wah
    Lee, Nicholas Ho Cheung
    Yan, Andrew T.
    Ng, Ming-Yen
    CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 147 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [5] Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Ullah, Waqas
    Ali, Zain
    Sadiq, Usama
    Rafiq, Ali
    Khan, Salman
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Sabouret, Pierre
    Fischman, David L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 132 : 22 - 28
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jing, Yunyan
    Ni, Bin
    Zhou, Donglai
    Zhang, Xingwei
    Liu, Shanxin
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 45 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin and heparin in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    You Zhai
    Hongcai Shang
    Yan Li
    Nan Zhang
    Jisi Zhang
    Shangwen Wu
    Systematic Reviews, 14 (1)
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of low dose rivaroxaban in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Safi U. Khan
    Muhammad Zia Khan
    Zain Ul Abideen Asad
    Shahul Valavoor
    Muhammad Usman Khan
    Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
    Troy Krupica
    Mohamad Alkhouli
    Edo Kaluski
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2020, 50 : 913 - 920
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of low dose rivaroxaban in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Safi U.
    Khan, Muhammad Zia
    Asad, Zain Ul Abideen
    Valavoor, Shahul
    Khan, Muhammad Usman
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Krupica, Troy
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Kaluski, Edo
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2020, 50 (04) : 913 - 920
  • [10] Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yuttana Wongsalap
    Supakorn Ungsriwong
    Wanalee Kumtep
    Surasak Saokaew
    Vichai Senthong
    Kirati Kengkla
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2022, 36 : 991 - 1000