Digital technology is challenging established legal doctrine concerning sexually-oriented expression, an area of relative stability for the past thirty years. Following an (1) Introduction, this paper examines: (2) COPA and the viability of "community standards" to assess obscenity; (3) CPPA and the emergence of the "secondary-effects" doctrine as rational for censoring sexual expression; (4) concludes by identifying the fundamental implications these two cases pose for the First Amendment.
机构:
Georgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Harrison Inst Publ Law, Washington, DC 20057 USAGeorgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Harrison Inst Publ Law, Washington, DC 20057 USA
机构:
Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Law, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
US Court Appeals Ninth Circuit, Berkeley, CA 94720 USAUniv Calif Berkeley, Sch Law, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
机构:
UCLA, Sch Law, Law & Social Justice, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
UCLA, Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAUCLA, Sch Law, Law & Social Justice, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA