Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: A secondary analysis protocol

被引:6
|
作者
Granholm, Anders [1 ]
Marker, Soren [1 ,2 ]
Krag, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Zampieri, Fernando G. [3 ]
Thorsen-Meyer, Hans-Christian [1 ,4 ]
Kaas-Hansen, Benjamin S. [4 ,5 ]
van der Horst, Iwan C. C. [6 ]
Lange, Theis [2 ,7 ,8 ]
Wetterslev, Jorn [2 ,9 ]
Perner, Anders [1 ,2 ]
Moller, Morten H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Rigshosp, 4131,Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Ctr Res Intens Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] HCor Hosp Coracao, Res Inst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Copenhagen, NNF Ctr Prot Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Zealand Univ Hosp, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Roskilde, Denmark
[6] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Crit Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Peking Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; PUMP INHIBITORS; R PACKAGE; IMPUTATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/aas.13432
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background In the Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit (SUP-ICU) trial, 3291 adult ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding were randomly allocated to intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo once daily in the ICU. No difference was observed between the groups in the primary outcome 90-day mortality or the secondary outcomes, except for clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding. However, heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) not detected by conventional subgroup analyses could be present. Methods This is a protocol and statistical analysis plan for a secondary, post hoc, exploratory analysis of the SUP-ICU trial. We will explore HTE in one set of subgroups based on severity of illness (using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II) and another set of subgroups based on the total number of risk factors for GI bleeding in each patient using Bayesian hierarchical models. We will summarise posterior probability distributions using medians and 95% credible intervals and present probabilities for different levels of benefit and harm of the intervention in each subgroup. Finally, we will assess if the treatment effect interacts with SAPS II and the number of risk factors separately on the continuous scale using marginal effects plots. Conclusions The outlined post hoc analysis will explore whether HTE was present in the SUP-ICU trial and may help answer some of the remaining questions regarding the balance between benefits and harms of pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk of GI bleeding. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02467621.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1256
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Survey of Prescriber Perceptions About Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the ICU
    Preslaski, Candice
    MacLaren, Robert
    Mueller, Scott
    Kiser, Tyree
    Fish, Douglas
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12)
  • [22] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill patients
    Schumock, GT
    Lam, NP
    Winkler, SR
    Kong, SXD
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (05) : 455 - 465
  • [23] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in trauma patients
    Jeffrey F Barletta
    Brian L Erstad
    John B Fortune
    Critical Care, 6
  • [24] Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients
    Anderson, Mary E.
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE CLINICS, 2013, 2 (01) : E32 - E44
  • [25] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in trauma patients
    Barletta, JF
    Erstad, BL
    Fortune, JB
    CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 6 (06): : 526 - 530
  • [26] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in adult intensive care unit patients - a protocol for a systematic review
    Barbateskovic, M.
    Marker, S.
    Jakobsen, J. C.
    Krag, M.
    Granholm, A.
    Anthon, C. T.
    Perner, A.
    Wetterslev, J.
    Moller, M. H.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 62 (06) : 744 - 755
  • [27] Stress ulcer prophylaxis in medical ICU patients: Annual utilization in relation to the incidence of endoscopically proven stress ulceration
    Devlin, JW
    Ben-Menachem, T
    Ulep, SK
    Peters, MJ
    Fogel, RP
    Zarowitz, BJ
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 32 (09) : 869 - 874
  • [28] Do we still need pharmacological stress ulcer prophylaxis at the ICU?
    Buendgens, Lukas
    Tacke, Frank
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (11) : 4201 - 4204
  • [29] Implementation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP) in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
    Shahbazi, Foroud
    Karimpur, Hasanali
    Hosseini, Elham
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 31 (06)
  • [30] Implementation of a pharmacy consult for stress ulcer prophylaxis management in the ICU.
    Wdowiarz, Kathryn
    Ochoa, Maria
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 36 (07): : E107 - E107