Sample size determination for semiparametric analysis of current status data

被引:3
|
作者
Wen, Chi-Chung [1 ]
Chen, Yi-Hau [2 ]
机构
[1] Tamkang Univ, Dept Math, New Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Acad Sinica, Inst Stat Sci, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
关键词
Cox proportional hazards model; power; sample size calculation; study design; transformation models; EFFICIENT ESTIMATION; HAZARDS REGRESSION; MODEL; SURVIVAL; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0962280218761493
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Semiparametric transformation models, which include the Cox proportional hazards and proportional odds models as special cases, are popular in current practice of survival analysis owing to that, in contrast to parametric models, no assumption on the baseline distribution is required. Although sample size calculations for semiparametric survival analysis with right-censored data are available, no such calculation exits in literature for semiparametric analysis with current status data, where only an examination time and whether the event occurs prior to the examination are observable. We develop sample size calculation for semiparametric two-group comparison or regression analysis with current status data. The proposed formula can be readily implemented with given effect size, power level, covariate group proportions, covariate-specific examination (censoring) time distributions, and proportions of events observed in the control group at a few knot points in the study period. Simulation results show that the proposed sample size calculation is adequate in the sense that it leads to studies with empirical power very close to the planned power level. We illustrate practical applications of the proposal through examples from an animal tumorigenicity study and a cross-sectional survey on osteoporosis status in the elderly.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2257
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of two-sample censored data using a semiparametric mixture model
    Gang Li
    Chien-tai Lin
    [J]. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series, 2009, 25 : 389 - 398
  • [42] On the determination of sample size
    Umbach, DM
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) : 137 - 138
  • [43] SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION
    HAWKES, AG
    [J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1965, 29 : 216 - &
  • [44] DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZE
    WYSHAK, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1973, 97 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [45] SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION
    PANTONY, DA
    [J]. CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 1966, 2 (01) : 28 - &
  • [46] Sample size determination for biomedical big data with limited labels
    Richter, Aaron N.
    Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M.
    [J]. NETWORK MODELING AND ANALYSIS IN HEALTH INFORMATICS AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 9 (01):
  • [47] Exact unconditional sample size determination for paired binary data
    Shan, Guogen
    Zhang, Hua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 84 : 188 - 190
  • [48] Sample size determination for biomedical big data with limited labels
    Aaron N. Richter
    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
    [J]. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, 2020, 9
  • [49] A Power Analysis for Fidelity Measurement Sample Size Determination
    Stokes, Lynne
    Allor, Jill H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 21 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [50] SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION IN BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS
    PHAMGIA, T
    TURKKAN, N
    [J]. STATISTICIAN, 1992, 41 (04): : 389 - 392