Biophysical Regulation of Cell Behavior-Cross Talk between Substrate Stiffness and Nanotopography

被引:202
|
作者
Yang, Yong [1 ]
Wang, Kai [1 ]
Gu, Xiaosong [2 ]
Leong, Kam W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Chem & Biomed Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Nantong Univ, Co Innovat Ctr Neuroregenerat, Key Lab Neuroregenerat Jiangsu & Minist Educ, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Extracellular matrix; Stiffness; Nanotopography; Adhesive ligands; Cell behavior; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; FOCAL ADHESION KINASE; SMOOTH-MUSCLE-CELLS; NEURAL PROGENITOR CELLS; CIRCULATING TUMOR-CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; SURFACE-CHEMISTRY; HIPPO PATHWAY; MYOSIN-II; EFFICIENT CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The stiffness and nanotopographical characteristics of the extracellular matrix (ECM) influence numerous developmental, physiological, and pathological processes in vivo. These biophysical cues have therefore been applied to modulate almost all aspects of cell behavior, from cell adhesion and spreading to proliferation and differentiation. Delineation of the biophysical modulation of cell behavior is critical to the rational design of new biomaterials, implants, and medical devices. The effects of stiffness and topographical cues on cell behavior have previously been reviewed, respectively; however, the interwoven effects of stiffness and nanotopographical cues on cell behavior have not been well described, despite similarities in phenotypic manifestations. Herein, we first review the effects of substrate stiffness and nanotopography on cell behavior, and then focus on intracellular transmission of the biophysical signals from integrins to nucleus. Attempts are made to connect extracellular regulation of cell behavior with the biophysical cues. We then discuss the challenges in dissecting the biophysical regulation of cell behavior and in translating the mechanistic understanding of these cues to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. (C) 2017 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 54
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regulation of Keratocyte Phenotype and Cell Behavior by Substrate Stiffness
    Chen, Jialin
    Backman, Ludvig J.
    Zhang, Wei
    Ling, Chen
    Danielson, Patrik
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (09): : 5162 - 5171
  • [2] Cross Talk Between Cell Death Regulation and Metabolism
    Fulda, Simone
    CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND AND BIOENERGETIC/MITOCHONDRIAL ASPECTS OF ONCOMETABOLISM, 2014, 542 : 81 - 90
  • [4] Cross-talk between tumor metabolism and cell cycle regulation
    Fajas, L.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2014, 210 : 14 - 14
  • [5] The Effect of Substrate Stiffness, Thickness, and Cross-Linking Density on Osteogenic Cell Behavior
    Mullen, Conleth A.
    Vaughan, Ted J.
    Billiar, Kristen L.
    McNamara, Laoise M.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 108 (07) : 1604 - 1612
  • [6] Influence of Anisotropic Substrate Stiffness on Cell Behavior
    Raghavan, Srikanth
    Rammohan, Aravind R.
    Hervy, Martial
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 102 (03) : 565A - 565A
  • [7] Influence of Substrate Thickness and Stiffness on Cell Behavior
    Raghavan, Srikanth
    Rammohan, Aravind R.
    Hervy, Martial
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 100 (03) : 444 - 444
  • [8] Cross-talk between calcium and protein kinase A in the regulation of cell migration
    Howe, Alan K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2011, 23 (05) : 554 - 561
  • [9] Impact of the cross-talk between circular and messenger RNAs on cell regulation
    Fumagalli, Maria Rita
    Zapperi, Stefano
    La Porta, Caterina A. M.
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 454 : 386 - 395
  • [10] Biophysical regulation of tumor cell invasion: moving beyond matrix stiffness
    Pathak, Amit
    Kumar, Sanjay
    INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 3 (04) : 267 - 278