PRODUCTIVITY OF OAT (Avena sativa L.)-BERSEEM (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) FORAGE MIXTURE IN IRRIGATED PLAIN OF PAKISTAN

被引:3
|
作者
Shoaib, Muhammad [1 ]
Khan, Muhammad Naeem [1 ]
Akhtar, Naveed [1 ]
Ayub, Muhammad [2 ]
Ashraf, Muhammad Saeed [1 ]
Ghaffar, Abdul [3 ]
Ullah, Sana [1 ]
机构
[1] AARI, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[2] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[3] MNS Univ Agr, Dept Agron, Multan, Pakistan
来源
关键词
clover suppression; crude protein; cutting time; dry matter; Neutral detergent fiber; BERSEEM CLOVER INTERCROPS; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; NUTRITIVE-VALUE; YIELD; QUALITY; COMPETITION; NITROGEN; BARLEY; PEA; RYEGRASS;
D O I
10.21162/PAKJAS/18.4947
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To assess the productivity of oat-berseem mixture in irrigated Indus plain of Pakistan, oat at four seeding rates (100, 75, 50, and 25%) was intercropped with berseem. The mixed seeded crop was harvested at late stem elongation (LSE), early booting (EB) and early heading (EH) stage of oat. First cut mixture herbage dry matter (DM) yield was lower than oat monoculture. Berseem substantially recovered from suppression by oat prior to first cut. After two cuts, mixtures herbage DM and crude protein (CP) yields were higher when first cut was taken at EH stage. On an average, first cut CP concentrations in mixtures were 11.25 g kg(-1) DM which was significantly higher as compared to oat monoculture. After two cuts, mixture with 25% oat ratio produced 6% higher CP yield than sole berseem. Fiber concentrations in mixtures were lower than sole oat in first cut while higher than sole berseem in re-growth cut. Thus mixing of oat seeding ratio as low as 25% combined with harvesting at EH cutting stage was proved to be more productive in terms of forage yield and quality.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 312
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY RESPONSE OF OAT (Avena sativa L.) CULTIVARS TO DIFFERENT SOWING TECHNIQUES
    Hameed, S.
    Ayub, M.
    Tahir, M.
    Khan, S.
    Bilal, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN AGRICULTURE, 2014, 3 (01): : 25 - 33
  • [32] Metabolic adjustments in forage oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes under different sowing windows
    Aanchaldeep Kaur
    Meenakshi Goyal
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2021, 27 : 2709 - 2725
  • [33] The use of DNA markers for genetic differentiation of common (Avena sativa L.) and naked oat (Avena nuda L.)
    Pipan, Barbara
    Sinkovic, Lovro
    Rutar, Romana
    Meglic, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2021, 22 (02): : 329 - 340
  • [34] Mechanisms of oat (Avena sativa L.) acclimation to phosphate deficiency
    Zebrowska, Ewa
    Milewska, Marta
    Ciereszko, Iwona
    PEERJ, 2017, 5
  • [35] Weed dynamics in fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes
    Palsaniya, D. R.
    Kumar, T. Kiran
    Prabhu, G.
    Dixit, A. K.
    Rai, A. K.
    Kumar, Sunil
    RANGE MANAGEMENT AND AGROFORESTRY, 2015, 36 (01) : 107 - 108
  • [36] Uridine and the control of phototropism in oat (Avena sativa L.) coleoptiles
    Tamimi, SM
    PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2004, 43 (02) : 173 - 177
  • [37] The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.)
    Mahadevan, M.
    Calderini, Daniel F.
    Zwer, Pamela K.
    Sadras, Victor O.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2016, 199 : 109 - 116
  • [38] Biological effects of gamma irradiation in oat (Avena sativa L.)
    Basha, M. H.
    Mehta, A. K.
    Gour, V. K.
    Kachare, Satish
    RANGE MANAGEMENT AND AGROFORESTRY, 2015, 36 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [39] Uridine and the Control of Phototropism in Oat (Avena sativa L.) Coleoptiles
    Samih M. Tamimi
    Plant Growth Regulation, 2004, 43 : 173 - 177
  • [40] Genetic diversity and variability analysis in oat (Avena sativa L.)
    Ahmed, S.
    Roy, A. K.
    Majumdar, A. B.
    RANGE MANAGEMENT AND AGROFORESTRY, 2011, 32 (02) : 96 - 99