Wildlife-livestock interactions and risk areas for cross-species spread of bovine tuberculosis

被引:22
|
作者
Meunier, Natascha V. [1 ,2 ]
Sebulime, Peregrine [3 ]
White, Richard G. [2 ]
Kock, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Pathogen Biol, London NW1 0TU, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London WC1, England
[3] Makerere Univ, Dept Wildlife & Aquat Anim Resources, Kampala, Uganda
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RUWENZORI-NATIONAL-PARK; MYCOBACTERIUM-BOVIS; AFRICAN BUFFALO; TRANSMISSION; CATTLE; INTERFACE; DISEASES; PATHOGENESIS; INFECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1221
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The transmission of diseases between livestock and wildlife can be a hindrance to effective disease control. Maintenance hosts and contact rates should be explored to further understand the transmission dynamics at the wildlife-livestock interface. Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) has been shown to have wildlife maintenance hosts and has been confirmed as present in the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP) in Uganda since the 1960s. The first aim of this study was to explore the spatio-temporal spread of cattle illegally grazing within the QENP recorded by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) rangers in a wildlife crime database. Secondly, we aimed to quantify wildlife-livestock interactions and cattle movements, on the border of QENP, using a longitudinal questionnaire completed by 30livestock owners. From this database, 426 cattle sightings were recorded within QENP in 8years. Thirteen (3.1%) of these came within a 300 m-4 week space-time window of a buffalo herd, using the recorded GPS data. Livestock owners reported an average of 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11) sightings of Uganda kob, waterbuck, buffalo or warthog per day over a 3-month period, with a rate of 0.22 (95% CI 0.20-0.25) sightings of buffalo per farmer per day. Reports placed 85.3% of the ungulate sightings and 88.0% of the buffalo sightings as further than 50 m away. Ungulate sightings were more likely to be closer to cattle at the homestead (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6) compared with the grazing area. Each cattle herd mixed with an average of five other cattle herds at both the communal grazing and watering points on a daily basis. Although wildlife and cattle regularly shared grazing and watering areas, they seldom came into contact close enough for aerosol transmission. Between species infection transmission is therefore likely to be by indirect or non-respiratory routes, which is suspected to be an infrequent mechanism of transmission of BTB. Occasional cross-species spillover of infection is possible, and the interaction of multiple wildlife species needs further investigation. Controlling the interface between wildlife and cattle in a situation where eradication is not being considered may have little impact on BTB disease control in cattle.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Portfolio-Balancing Approach to Natural Capital and Liabilities: Managing Livestock and Wildlife Diseases with Cross-Species Transmission
    Horan, Richard D.
    Fenichel, Eli P.
    Finnoff, David
    Reeling, Carson
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 70 (03): : 673 - 689
  • [32] A Portfolio-Balancing Approach to Natural Capital and Liabilities: Managing Livestock and Wildlife Diseases with Cross-Species Transmission
    Richard D. Horan
    Eli P. Fenichel
    David Finnoff
    Carson Reeling
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2018, 70 : 673 - 689
  • [33] Adaptive risk-based targeted surveillance for foreign animal diseases at the wildlife-livestock interface
    Miller, Ryan S.
    Bevins, Sarah N.
    Cook, Gericke
    Free, Ross
    Pepin, Kim M.
    Gidlewski, Thomas
    Brown, Vienna R.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2022, 69 (05) : E2329 - E2340
  • [34] Comparison of species diversity, richness, and abundance of dung beetles between wildlife and wildlife-livestock systems in north-eastern Namibia
    Ndozi, Mukendwa Hosticks
    Gohole, Linnet
    Mapaure, Isaac
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TROPICAL INSECT SCIENCE, 2025,
  • [35] Detection of Anaplasma antibodies in wildlife and domestic species in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Kenya by major surface protein 5 competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
    Ngeranwa, J. J. N.
    Shompole, S. P.
    Venter, E. H.
    Wambugu, A.
    Crafford, J. E.
    Penzhorn, B. L.
    ONDERSTEPOORT JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2008, 75 (03) : 199 - 205
  • [36] Molecular Diversity of Hard Tick Species from Selected Areas of a Wildlife-Livestock Interface Ecosystem at Mikumi National Park, Morogoro Region, Tanzania
    Damian, Donath
    Damas, Modester
    Wensman, Jonas Johansson
    Berg, Mikael
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [37] Risk Factors for Exposure of Wild Birds to West Nile Virus in A Gradient of Wildlife-Livestock Interaction
    Casades-Marti, Laia
    Holgado-Martin, Rocio
    Aguilera-Sepulveda, Pilar
    Llorente, Francisco
    Perez-Ramirez, Elisa
    Jimenez-Clavero, Miguel Angel
    Ruiz-Fons, Francisco
    PATHOGENS, 2023, 12 (01):
  • [38] Cross-species spread of SCCmec IV subtypes in staphylococci
    Smyth, Davida S.
    Wong, Agnes
    Robinson, D. Ashley
    INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2011, 11 (02) : 446 - 453
  • [39] Comparison of Three Methods to Assess the Potential for Bushpig-Domestic Pig Interactions at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface in Uganda
    Payne, Ariane
    Ogweng, Peter
    Ojok, Alfred
    Etter, Eric
    Gilot-Fromont, Emmanuelle
    Masembe, Charles
    Stahl, Karl
    Jori, Ferran
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [40] Quantifying wildlife-livestock interactions and their spatio-temporal patterns: Is regular grid camera trapping a suitable approach?
    Triguero-Ocana, Roxana
    Vicente, Joaquin
    Palencia, Pablo
    Laguna, Eduardo
    Acevedo, Pelayo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117