Wildlife-livestock interactions and risk areas for cross-species spread of bovine tuberculosis

被引:22
|
作者
Meunier, Natascha V. [1 ,2 ]
Sebulime, Peregrine [3 ]
White, Richard G. [2 ]
Kock, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Pathogen Biol, London NW1 0TU, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, London WC1, England
[3] Makerere Univ, Dept Wildlife & Aquat Anim Resources, Kampala, Uganda
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RUWENZORI-NATIONAL-PARK; MYCOBACTERIUM-BOVIS; AFRICAN BUFFALO; TRANSMISSION; CATTLE; INTERFACE; DISEASES; PATHOGENESIS; INFECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1221
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The transmission of diseases between livestock and wildlife can be a hindrance to effective disease control. Maintenance hosts and contact rates should be explored to further understand the transmission dynamics at the wildlife-livestock interface. Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) has been shown to have wildlife maintenance hosts and has been confirmed as present in the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP) in Uganda since the 1960s. The first aim of this study was to explore the spatio-temporal spread of cattle illegally grazing within the QENP recorded by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) rangers in a wildlife crime database. Secondly, we aimed to quantify wildlife-livestock interactions and cattle movements, on the border of QENP, using a longitudinal questionnaire completed by 30livestock owners. From this database, 426 cattle sightings were recorded within QENP in 8years. Thirteen (3.1%) of these came within a 300 m-4 week space-time window of a buffalo herd, using the recorded GPS data. Livestock owners reported an average of 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11) sightings of Uganda kob, waterbuck, buffalo or warthog per day over a 3-month period, with a rate of 0.22 (95% CI 0.20-0.25) sightings of buffalo per farmer per day. Reports placed 85.3% of the ungulate sightings and 88.0% of the buffalo sightings as further than 50 m away. Ungulate sightings were more likely to be closer to cattle at the homestead (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6) compared with the grazing area. Each cattle herd mixed with an average of five other cattle herds at both the communal grazing and watering points on a daily basis. Although wildlife and cattle regularly shared grazing and watering areas, they seldom came into contact close enough for aerosol transmission. Between species infection transmission is therefore likely to be by indirect or non-respiratory routes, which is suspected to be an infrequent mechanism of transmission of BTB. Occasional cross-species spillover of infection is possible, and the interaction of multiple wildlife species needs further investigation. Controlling the interface between wildlife and cattle in a situation where eradication is not being considered may have little impact on BTB disease control in cattle.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wildlife-livestock interactions policy
    Gilardi, Kirsten
    Jessup, David A.
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 230 (12): : 1796 - 1796
  • [2] Wildlife-livestock interactions policy adopted
    不详
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 230 (10): : 1438 - 1439
  • [3] Cattle owners' awareness of bovine tuberculosis in high and low prevalence settings of the wildlife-livestock interface areas in Zambia
    Musso Munyeme
    John B Muma
    Hetron M Munang'andu
    Clovice Kankya
    Eystein Skjerve
    Morten Tryland
    BMC Veterinary Research, 6
  • [4] Cattle owners' awareness of bovine tuberculosis in high and low prevalence settings of the wildlife-livestock interface areas in Zambia
    Munyeme, Musso
    Muma, John B.
    Munang'andu, Hetron M.
    Kankya, Clovice
    Skjerve, Eystein
    Tryland, Morten
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2010, 6
  • [5] Cost benefit analysis of tuberculosis control in wildlife-livestock interface areas of Southern Zambia
    Mwacalimba, K. K.
    Mumba, C.
    Munyeme, M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 110 (02) : 274 - 279
  • [6] Spread and mitigation of antimicrobial resistance at the wildlife-urban and wildlife-livestock interfaces
    Vezeau, Neil
    Kahn, Laura
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 262 (06): : 741 - 747
  • [7] Modelling multi-species and multi-mode contact networks: Implications for persistence of bovine tuberculosis at the wildlife-livestock interface
    Wilber, Mark Q.
    Pepin, Kim M.
    Campa, Henry, III
    Hygnstrom, Scott E.
    Lavelle, Michael J.
    Xifara, Tatiana
    VerCauteren, Kurt C.
    Webb, Colleen T.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (06) : 1471 - 1481
  • [8] Description and implementation of an On-farm Wildlife Risk Mitigation Protocol at the wildlife-livestock interface: Tuberculosis in Mediterranean environments
    Martinez-Guijosa, Jordi
    Francisco Lima-Barbero, Jose
    Acevedo, Pelayo
    Cano-Terriza, David
    Jimenez-Ruiz, Saul
    Angel Barasona, Jose
    Boadella, Mariana
    Garcia-Bocanegra, Ignacio
    Gortazar, Christian
    Vicente, Joaquin
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 191
  • [9] Bovine tuberculosis in Michigan wildlife and livestock
    Schmitt, SM
    O'Brien, DJ
    Bruning-Fann, CS
    Fitzgerald, SD
    DOMESTIC ANIMAL/WILDLIFE INTERFACE: ISSUE FOR DISEASE CONTROL, CONSERVATION, SUSTAINABLE FOOD PRODUCTION, AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2002, 969 : 262 - 268
  • [10] Incorporating farmer observations in efforts to manage bovine tuberculosis using barrier fencing at the wildlife-livestock interface
    Brook, Ryan K.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2010, 94 (3-4) : 301 - 305