RAMI analysis of the ITER Central Safety System

被引:1
|
作者
Kitazawa, Sin-iti [1 ]
Okayama, Katsumi [2 ]
Neyatani, Yuzuru [1 ]
Sagot, Francois [2 ]
van Houtte, Didier [2 ]
机构
[1] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, ITER Project Unit, Naka, Ibaraki 3110193, Japan
[2] ITER Org, F-13115 St Paul Les Durance, France
关键词
RAMI; Availability; Nuclear fusion; ITER; Safety; CSS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.014
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
ITER is the first worldwide international project aiming to design a facility to produce nuclear fusion energy. The technical requirements of its plant systems have been established in the ITER Project Baseline. In the project, the Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Inspectability (RAMI) approach has been adopted for technical risk control to help aid the design of the components in preparation for operation and maintenance. A RAMI analysis was performed on the conceptual design of the ITER Central Safety System (CSS). A functional breakdown was prepared in a bottom-up approach, resulting in the system being divided into 2 main functions and 20 sub-functions. These functions were described using the IDEF0 method. Reliability block diagrams were prepared to estimate the reliability and availability of each function under the stipulated operating conditions. Initial and expected scenarios were analyzed to define risk-mitigation actions. The inherent availability of the ITER CSS expected after implementation of mitigation actions was calculated to be 99.80% over 2 years, which is the typical interval of the scheduled maintenance cycles. This is consistent with the project required value of 99.9 +/- 0.1%. A Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis was performed with criticality charts highlighting the risk level of the different failure modes with regard to their probability of occurrence and their effects on the availability of the plasma operation. This analysis defined when risk mitigation actions were required in terms of design, testing, operation procedures and/or maintenance to reduce the risk levels and increase the availability of the main functions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 805
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selection of bounding events for ITER safety analysis
    Taylor, NP
    20TH IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 160 - 163
  • [32] ITER Central Solenoid Support Structure Analysis
    Freudenberg, Kevin D.
    Myatt, R. Leonard
    2011 IEEE/NPSS 24TH SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING (SOFE), 2011,
  • [33] Safety analysis of ITER EDA design by GEMSAFE
    Tokyo Inst of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
    J Fusion Energy, 1-2 (195-203):
  • [34] RAMI analysis for DEMO HCPB blanket concept cooling system
    Dongiovanni, Danilo N.
    Pinna, Tonio
    Carloni, Dario
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 98-99 : 2125 - 2129
  • [35] RAMI Analyses of Heating Neutral Beam and Diagnostic Neutral Beam Systems for ITER
    Chang, D. H.
    Lee, S.
    Hemsworth, R.
    van Houtte, D.
    Okayama, K.
    Sagot, F.
    Schunke, B.
    Svensson, L.
    SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON NEGATIVE IONS, BEAMS AND SOURCES, 2011, 1390
  • [36] Safety classification of the ITER fusion power shutdown system and resulting safety requirements
    Costa, M
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2001, 54 (3-4) : 361 - 374
  • [37] Thermal hydraulic transient analysis of ITER safety-relevant secondary cooling water system
    Vicini, Lavinia
    Schiliuk, Nicolas
    Coscarelli, Eugenio
    Dell'Orco, Giovanni
    Narcisi, Vincenzo
    Caruso, Gianfranco
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2021, 165
  • [38] RISK ANALYSIS OF THE ITER CRYOGENIC SYSTEM
    Chorowski, M.
    Fydrych, J.
    Grabowski, M.
    Serio, L.
    ADVANCES IN CRYOGENIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 57A AND 57B, 2012, 1434 : 1559 - 1566
  • [39] Safety Analysis Results for Cryostat Ingress Accidents in ITER
    B. J. Merrill
    L. C. Cadwallader
    D. A. Petti
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 1997, 16 : 119 - 124
  • [40] Neutronic analysis of iter cryopump system
    Petrizzi, L.
    Loughlin, M.
    Martin, A.
    Moro, F.
    Villari, R.
    Merola, M.
    Pearce, R.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2009, 84 (7-11) : 1505 - 1509