Software process and product improvement: an empirical assessment

被引:33
|
作者
Kuilboer, JP [1 ]
Ashrafi, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
关键词
software process improvement; CMM; ISO-9000; quality factors; empirical assessment;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-5849(99)00054-3
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite all the attention that software process improvement (SPI) practices have received, there is no solid evidence of how extensively they are used across organizations, and their impact on quality, cost, and on-time delivery. The findings of previous studies are based on case studies, often assessing the effectiveness of a particular methodology in a large company. In our attempt to obtain a broader insight into the software process improvement practices, we conducted a survey targeted at software developers in New England. We collected 67 responses and used descriptive statistics to analyze the survey results. In addition, we examined the impact of SPI methodologies on quality factors and compared the impact to the importance of quality factors for software developers. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to determine the degree of correlation between the two. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GSEPIM: A roadmap for software process assessment and improvement in the domain of global software development
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Keung, Jacky
    Niazi, Mahmood
    Hussain, Shahid
    Shameem, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2019, 31 (01)
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment Software for Product and Process Sustainability Analysis
    Vervaeke, Marina
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 89 (07) : 884 - 890
  • [43] Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies
    Coleman, Gerry
    O'Connor, Rory
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 49 (06) : 654 - 667
  • [44] An empirical study of industrial requirements engineering process assessment and improvement
    Sommerville, I
    Ransom, J
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND METHODOLOGY, 2005, 14 (01) : 85 - 117
  • [45] Knowledge-based Tool for Software Process Assessment and Improvement
    Lima Silva, Maria Helynne
    de Carvalho Correia, Ana Carla
    da Silva Costa, Carlos Eduardo
    da Silva, Leandro Dias
    Paes, Rodrigo de Barros
    Praes, Rodrigo Aiello
    Silvestre de Sousa, Joao Manoel
    de Carvalho, Gustavo Robichez
    FUTURE COMPUTING 2010: THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2010, : 1 - 7
  • [46] Reflecting on the Use of the Policy-Process-Product Theory in Empirical Software Engineering
    Kalu, Kelechi G.
    Schorlemmer, Taylor R.
    Chen, Sophie
    Robinson, Kyle A.
    Kocinare, Erik
    Davis, James C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST ACM JOINT MEETING EUROPEAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, ESEC/FSE 2023, 2023, : 2112 - 2116
  • [47] The software evolution process, its global improvement, and the perceived efficacy of process assessment schemes as improvement drivers
    Gray, EM
    Smith, WL
    SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT METHODS FOR THE NEXT CENTURY, 1997, : 141 - 153
  • [48] Software process improvement
    Greene, Jim
    Managing System Development, 1998, 18 (02):
  • [49] SOFTWARE PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
    KARKARIA, DJ
    NORRIS, MT
    PENGELLY, AD
    BT TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 1993, 11 (01): : 133 - 144
  • [50] SOFTWARE PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
    KARKARIA, DJ
    NORRIS, MT
    PENGELLY, AD
    IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1994, 12 (02) : 271 - 278