Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the AquaCrop model for maize under different irrigation and fertilizer management conditions

被引:28
|
作者
Guo, Daxin [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Rongheng [1 ,2 ]
Xing, Xuguang [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Xiaoyi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Are, Minist Educ, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Crop model; sensitive parameter; time response outputs; water and fertility stresses; canopy cover; biomass; SIMULATE YIELD RESPONSE; FAO CROP MODEL; RAIN-FED MAIZE; WATER-STRESS; NICKEL APPLICATION; PRODUCTIVITY; BIOMASS; GROWTH; IMPACTS; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1080/03650340.2019.1657845
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop model parameters usually vary with diverse field management and environment conditions, which hinder the model calibration. Sensitivity analysis (SA) and uncertainty analysis (UA) for model parameters and outputs are helpful for calibrating crop model under diverse conditions. A global SA and UA were used to determine the maize parameters sensitivity and outputs uncertainty of the AquaCrop model under different irrigation and fertilizer management conditions, i.e. none, slight, and moderate stress pertaining to water and fertility. The results indicated that the sensitive parameters to maximum above ground biomass (AGB) and yield differed from those to canopy cover development and AGB production (time-response outputs of the AquaCrop). The sensitive parameters should be preferentially calibrated given their strong effects on all type of model outputs, besides, the sensitive parameters to the model time-response outputs were somewhat different from those to the model non-time-response outputs. The interaction effects among parameters on the model outputs should receive more attention in the model calibration. The SA and UA results between diverse management were clearly different, and these differences between different fertility stress levels were larger. Fertility stress is a more influential factor on parameters sensitivity and outputs uncertainty than water stress in the AquaCrop model.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1133
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulating Maize Yield Response to Depletion of Available Soil Water and Nitrogen Management under Drip Irrigation with the FAO AquaCrop Model
    E. Amiri
    M. Abedinpour
    [J]. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 46 (6) : 602 - 608
  • [22] Calibration and Evaluation of Aquacrop for Maize (Zea Mays L.) under Different Irrigation and Cultivation Methods
    Hassan, Diaa Fliah
    Ati, Alaa Salih
    Neima, AbdulKhalik Saleh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 22 (10): : 192 - 204
  • [23] Effective management of irrigation water for maize under stressed conditions
    Panda, RK
    Behera, SK
    Kashyap, PS
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2004, 66 (03) : 181 - 203
  • [24] Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for simulating Canola under different irrigation managements in a semiarid area
    Mousavizadeh, S. F.
    Honar, T.
    Ahmadi, S. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2016, 10 (04) : 425 - 445
  • [25] AquaCrop Model Evaluation for Winter Wheat under Different Irrigation Management Strategies: A Case Study on the North China Plain
    Wang, Guangshuai
    Mehmood, Faisal
    Zain, Muhammad
    Hamani, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila
    Xue, Jingjie
    Gao, Yang
    Duan, Aiwang
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [26] Assessment of FAO AquaCrop Model for Simulating Maize Growth and Productivity under Deficit Irrigation in a Tropical Environment
    Greaves, Geneille E.
    Wang, Yu-Min
    [J]. WATER, 2016, 8 (12)
  • [27] Performance of AquaCrop model in simulating maize growth, yield, and evapotranspiration under rainfed, limited and full irrigation
    Sandhu, Rupinder
    Irmak, Suat
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 223
  • [29] Nitrate leaching in a silage maize field under different irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rates
    Gheysari, Mahdi
    Mirlatifi, Seyed Majid
    Homaee, Mehdi
    Asadi, Mohammad Esmaeil
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 96 (06) : 946 - 954
  • [30] Greenhouse gas emissions and drivers of the global warming potential of vineyards under different irrigation and fertilizer management practices
    Peng, Xuelian
    Chen, Dianyu
    Zhen, Jingbo
    Wang, Yakun
    Hu, Xiaotao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 950