Safety and efficacy of dabigatran versus warfarin in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:64
|
作者
Providencia, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Albenque, Jean-Paul [1 ]
Combes, Stephane [1 ]
Bouzeman, Abdeslam [1 ]
Casteigt, Benjamin [1 ]
Combes, Nicolas [1 ]
Narayanan, Kumar [3 ]
Marijon, Eloi [3 ,4 ]
Boveda, Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Pasteur, Dept Rythmol, F-31076 Toulouse 3, France
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Inst Heart, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[4] Paris Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Paris, France
关键词
PERIPROCEDURAL ANTICOAGULATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; COMPLICATIONS; RIVAROXABAN; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304386
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Dabigatran etexilate, a new thrombin inhibitor, has been shown to be comparable to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a limited body of evidence on the efficacy and safety of using dabigatran among patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. Objective A random effects meta-analysis was performed of controlled trials comparing dabigatran and warfarin in paroxysmal/persistent AF patients undergoing catheter ablation. Methods Data sources included Medline, Embase, and Cochrane (from inception to April 2013). Three independent reviewers selected studies comparing warfarin to dabigatran. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted from each selected study, regarding periprocedural all cause mortality, thromboembolic events and major bleeding, as well as modalities of periprocedural anticoagulation bridging. Results After a detailed screening of 228 search results, 14 studies were identified enrolling a total of 4782 patients (1823 treated with dabigatran and 2959 with warfarin). No deaths were reported. No significant differences were found between patients treated with dabigatran and warfarin as regards thromboembolic events (0.55% dabigatran vs 0.17% warfarin; risk ratios (RR)=1.78, 95% CI 0.66 to 4.80; p=0.26) and major bleeding (1.48% dabigatran vs 1.35% warfarin; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.26; p=0.86). No difference was found between the 110 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily dabigatran dosages concerning major bleeding (0% vs 1.62%, respectively; RR=0.19, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.18; p=0.25) and thromboembolism (0% vs 0.40%, respectively; RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.04 to 12.98; p=0.82). Conclusions In the specific setting of AF catheter ablation, this first pooled analysis suggests that patients treated with dabigatran have a similar incidence of thromboembolic events and major bleeding compared to warfarin, with low event rates overall.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 335
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] META-ANALYSIS OF SAFETY OF DABIGATRAN AND WARFARIN FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Aggarwal, S.
    Kumar, S.
    Segal, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A105 - A106
  • [22] Safety and Efficacy of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation With Pulsed Field Ablation versus Thermal Energy Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aldaas, Omar M.
    Aldaas, Amer M.
    Han, Frederick
    Hoffmayer, Kurt S.
    Krummen, David E.
    Ho, Gordon
    Raissi, Farshad
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    Feld, Gregory K.
    Hsu, Jonathan C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [23] THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS VERSUS WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Miller, Corey S.
    Grandi, Sonia
    Shimony, Avi
    Filion, Kristian
    Eisenberg, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E604 - E604
  • [24] Safety of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Reply
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
    Reddy, Yeruva Madhu
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Natale, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (12) : 1119 - 1120
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of driver-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramirez, F. Daniel
    Birnie, David H.
    Nair, Girish M.
    Szczotkamlis, Agnieszka
    Redpath, Calum J.
    Sadekmd, Mouhannad M.
    Nery, Pablo B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (12) : 1371 - 1378
  • [26] A systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Wang, Peng
    He, Wuyang
    Li, Chunqiu
    Xiang, Tingting
    Yang, Qiaoyun
    Chen, Qingwei
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10) : 10542 - 10555
  • [27] Safety and efficacy of steerable versus non-steerable sheaths for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin, Xinyao
    Zhou, Yuqing
    Wu, Yuanhong
    Xie, Mingbin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [28] META-ANALYSIS FOR SAFETY OF DABIGATRAN AND WARFARIN FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Aggarwal, S.
    Topaloglu, H.
    Messenger, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A274 - A274
  • [29] META-ANALYSIS OF SAFETY OF DABIGATRAN AND WARFARIN FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Aggarwal, S.
    Segal, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A515 - A515
  • [30] Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants (Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban) Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Miller, Corey S.
    Grandi, Sonia M.
    Shimony, Avi
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 110 (03): : 453 - 460