Preweaning mortality in group-housed lactating sows: Hormonal differences between high risk and low risk sows

被引:8
|
作者
Phillips, C. E. [1 ]
Farmer, C. [2 ]
Anderson, J. E. [3 ]
Johnston, L. J. [4 ]
Shurson, G. C. [1 ]
Deen, J. [5 ]
Keisler, D. H. [6 ]
Conner, A. M. [6 ]
Li, Y. Z. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Food Agr & Nat Resource Sci, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine R & D Ctr, Sherbrooke, PQ J1M 0C8, Canada
[3] Univ Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, West Cent Res & Outreach Ctr, Morris, MN 56267 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Coll Vet Med, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[6] Univ Missouri, Div Anim Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
group farrowing; maternal hormones; piglet mortality; sow; PITUITARY-ADRENAL AXIS; PIGLET MORTALITY; OXYTOCIN RELEASE; PLASMA OXYTOCIN; BEHAVIOR; PROLACTIN; STRESS; PARTURITION; ENVIRONMENT; CORTISOL;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2014-7624
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study used an endocrinological approach to explain the differences between sows that have higher vs. lower preweaning mortality in a group-farrowing system. The association between sows that had 2 or more piglets die within the first 72 h postfarrowing (high risk) or sows that had 1 or no piglets die within the first 72 h postfarrowing (low risk) with changes in serum hormone concentrations was investigated. Multiparous sows (n = 63; parity 2 to 7) from 4 contemporary breeding groups, each mated within a week, were used. Sows were housed in a group-farrowing system where 8 sows farrowed in individual pens and shared a communal feeding and dunging area in each room. Reproductive performance, including total born, born alive, and stillborn per litter, individual weight of piglets at birth and weaning (at 5 wk postfarrowing), litter size at weaning, preweaning mortality of piglets, and sow BW before farrowing and after weaning, were recorded for all sows. Of these sows, 14 sows from 2 breeding groups were selected randomly for blood sampling through an indwelling ear vein catheter. A blood sample was collected daily from each sow 2 d prefarrowing through 2 d postfarrowing. Serum samples were analyzed for prolactin, oxytocin, cortisol, and urocortin concentrations using RIA. Among the 14 sows, 7 sows lost 2 or more piglets during the first 72 h after farrowing and were classified as high risk sows, and the other 7 sows lost 0 or 1 piglet during the same period and were classified as low risk sows. Catheters in 11 sows (5 high risk sows and 6 low risk sows) remained functional for the entire sampling period. Results indicate that high risk sows farrowed larger litters (live born = 13.8 +/- 0.50 vs. 11.3 +/- 0.48 piglets; P = 0.03) with lighter piglets (1.4 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.05 kg; P < 0.001) compared with low risk sows. In addition, high risk sows had greater oxytocin concentrations (0.09 vs. 0.07 ng/mL; SE = 0.02, P = 0.01), which might be associated with larger litters farrowed, compared with low risk sows. There were no differences between high risk and low risk sows (P > 0.30) in terms of serum prolactin, cortisol, or urocortin concentrations. These results suggest that litter size and birth weight of piglets played an important role in preweaning mortality of piglets and hormone concentrations in sows were not associated with piglet mortality in the group-farrowing system used.
引用
收藏
页码:2603 / 2611
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HIGH AND LOW HYPOGLYCAEMIA RISK POPULATIONS USING CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING DATASETS
    Gimenez, M.
    Moscardo, V.
    Reddy, M.
    Conget, I.
    Oliver, N.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 20 : A97 - A97
  • [22] Low breastfeeding rates in women with high risk of gestational diabetes: differences between South Asians and Caucasians
    Vekaria, R.
    Bhatt, R.
    Venkataraman, H.
    Sukumar, N.
    Saravanan, P.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 : 179 - 179
  • [23] Brooding Rumination and Heart Rate Variability in Women at High and Low Risk for Depression: Group Differences and Moderation by COMT Genotype
    Woody, Mary L.
    McGeary, John E.
    Gibb, Brandon E.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 123 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [24] Determinants of cervical human papillomavirus infection: Differences between high- and low-oncogenic risk types
    Chan, PKS
    Chang, AR
    Cheung, JLK
    Chan, DPC
    Xu, LY
    Tang, NLS
    Cheng, AF
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 185 (01): : 28 - 35
  • [25] Apples to apples? Neural correlates of emotion regulation differences between high- and low-risk adolescents
    Perino, Michael T.
    Moreira, Joao F. Guassi
    McCormick, Ethan M.
    Telzer, Eva H.
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 14 (08) : 827 - 836
  • [26] Differences in risk factors between high and low vertical HIV transmission settings: Implications for elimination of paediatric HIV
    Mahumane, A.
    Lwilla, A. F.
    Elsbernd, K.
    Rauscher, M.
    Meggi, B.
    Pereira, K.
    Lequechane, J.
    Chale, F.
    Boniface, S.
    Edom, R.
    Mudenyanga, C.
    Mueller, M.
    Buck, W. C.
    Taveira, N.
    Hoelscher, M.
    Jani, I.
    Ntinginya, N. E.
    Kroidl, A.
    Sabi, I.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2024, 27 : 36 - 36
  • [27] Emotional reactions to alcohol-related words: Differences between low- and high-risk drinkers
    Gantiva, Carlos
    Delgado, Rafael
    Romo-Gonzalez, Tania
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2015, 50 : 60 - 63
  • [28] Differences in K-ras codon 12 mutation frequency between "high-risk" and "low-risk" HPV-infected samples
    Golijow, CD
    Mourón, SA
    Gómez, MA
    Dulout, FN
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 75 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [30] Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low- and high-growth entrepreneurs: A reply in a more conservative vein
    Miner, JB
    Raju, NS
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (01) : 3 - 13