Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy

被引:22
|
作者
Kinnaird, Adam [1 ]
Sharma, Vidit [1 ]
Chuang, Ryan [1 ]
Priester, Alan [2 ]
Tran, Elizabeth [1 ]
Barsa, Danielle E. [1 ]
Delfin, Merdie [1 ]
Kwan, Lorna [1 ]
Sisk, Anthony [3 ]
Felker, Ely [4 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza,3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 06期
关键词
biopsy; prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy which reveals no cancer may impart reassurance beyond that offered by ultrasound guided biopsy. However, followup of men after a negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy has been mostly by prostate specific antigen testing and reports of followup tissue confirmation are few. We investigated the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in such men who, because of persistent cancer suspicion, subsequently underwent a repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Materials and Methods: Subjects were all men with a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy who underwent at least 1 further magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy due to continued clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (September 2009 to July 2019). Biopsies were magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion with targeted and systematic cores. Regions of interest from initial magnetic resonance imaging and any new regions of interest at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were targeted. The primary end point was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater). Results: Of 2,716 men 733 had a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Study subjects were 73/733 who underwent followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Median (IQR) age and prostate specific antigen density were 64 years (59-67) and 0.12 ng/ml/cc (0.08-0.17), respectively. Baseline PI-RADS (R) scores were 3 or greater in 74%. At followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy (median 2.4 years, IQR 1.3e3.6), 17/73 (23%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. When followup magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion (PI-RADS 3 or greater), clinically significant prostate cancer was found in 17/53 (32%). When followup magnetic resonance imaging was negative (PI-RADS less than 3), cancer was not found (0/ 20) (p <0.01). Overall 54% of men with PI-RADS 5 at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging following an initial negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy are unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer and may avoid repeat biopsy. However, when lesions are seen on followup magnetic resonance imaging, repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Kittner, Beatrice
    Blobel, Conrad
    Wiemer, Laura
    Hofbauer, Sebastian L.
    Fischer, Thomas
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Fuller, Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Cash, Hannes
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (02) : 211 - 218
  • [42] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy-A review of literature
    Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    Roof, Shannon
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 8 (01) : 105 - 116
  • [43] RACIAL DISPARITIES IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED BIOPSY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES
    Kalapara, Arveen
    Watarai, Bradly
    Jarosek, Stephanie
    Konety, Badrinath
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E815 - E816
  • [44] Importance of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for the detection and monitoring of prostate cancer
    Ganzer, R.
    Brummeisl, W.
    Siokou, F. S.
    Scheck, R.
    Franz, T.
    Ho-Thi, P.
    Mangold, A.
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2019, 58 (12): : 1499 - 1508
  • [45] RACIAL DISPARITIES IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-GUIDED BIOPSY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES
    Hanna, Peter
    Kalapara, Arveen
    Watarai, Bradly
    Jarosek, Stephanie
    Konety, Badrinath
    Warlick, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1092 - E1093
  • [46] Prognostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in defining prostate cancer anterior lesions
    Angelo Porreca
    Federico Mineo Bianchi
    Antonio Salvaggio
    Daniele D’Agostino
    Alessandro Del Rosso
    Daniele Romagnoli
    Paolo Corsi
    Michele Colicchia
    Umberto Barbaresi
    Lorenzo Bianchi
    Marco Giampaoli
    Riccardo Schiavina
    Katie Palmer
    Francesco Del Giudice
    Martina Maggi
    Matteo Ferro
    Alessandro Sciarra
    Ettore De Berardinis
    Gian Maria Busetto
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1473 - 1479
  • [47] 912 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in The Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Bhojwani, A.
    Desai, C.
    Ehsanullah, S. A.
    Shahzad, S. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [48] The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
    Recabal, Pedro
    Assel, Melissa
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Lee, Daniel
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James A.
    Vargas, Hebert A.
    Coleman, Jonathan
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02): : 374 - 380
  • [49] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [50] MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING 3T AND PROSTATE CANCER: CORRELATION WITH TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Castellucci, Roberto
    Altieri, Vincenzo Maria
    Marchioni, Michele
    Castellan, Pietro
    Pellegrini, Maurizio
    Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
    Sanchez-Gomez, Javier
    De Francesco, Piergustavo
    Ingrosso, Manuela
    Tartaro, Armando
    Tenaglia, Raffaele Lanfranca
    [J]. ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2015, 68 (05): : 493 - 501