New public management and welfare-to-work in Australia: Comparing the reform agendas of the ALP and the Coalition

被引:12
|
作者
Considine, Mark [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Siobhan [2 ]
Phuc Nguyen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
employment policy; employment service; labour market institutions; new public policy; public management; welfare state; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1080/10361146.2014.931343
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, the adoption of new public management (NPM) as a management philosophy has translated into multiple waves of reform in the employment services sector in Australia, namely Working Nation (1994-96), Job Network (JN: 1996-2009) and Job Services Australia (JSA: 2009-present). Each wave has sought to improve the preceding policy. In this article, we examine changes implemented during the Rudd/Gillard Labor governments. Using government policy documents and survey data from frontline employment services staff, we compare JSA to JN against five benchmarks. Our data indicate that JSA has generated modest improvement. JSA is also a system with less emphasis on strong forms of sanctioning. Our combined data suggest that policy actors operating under NPM conditions are indeed able to influence specific aspects of frontline practice, but they must spend great effort to do so and must accept new imperfections as a consequence.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:469 / 485
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条