The limits of earthquake early warning: Timeliness of ground motion estimates

被引:110
|
作者
Minson, Sarah E. [1 ]
Meier, Men-Andrin [2 ]
Baltay, Annemarie S. [1 ]
Hanks, Thomas C. [1 ]
Cochran, Elizabeth S. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Pasadena, CA 91106 USA
来源
SCIENCE ADVANCES | 2018年 / 4卷 / 03期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
CALIFORNIA; RUPTURE; PERFORMANCE; RIDGECREST; SIMULATION; MODELS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1126/sciadv.aaq0504
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The basic physics of earthquakes is such that strong ground motion cannot be expected from an earthquake unless the earthquake itself is very close or has grown to be very large. We use simple seismological relationships to calculate the minimum time that must elapse before such ground motion can be expected at a distance from the earthquake, assuming that the earthquake magnitude is not predictable. Earthquake early warning (EEW) systems are in operation or development for many regions around the world, with the goal of providing enough warning of incoming ground shaking to allow people and automated systems to take protective actions to mitigate losses. However, the question of how much warning time is physically possible for specified levels of ground motion has not been addressed. We consider a zero-latency EEW system to determine possible warning times a user could receive in an ideal case. In this case, the only limitation on warning time is the time required for the earthquake to evolve and the time for strong ground motion to arrive at a user's location. We find that users who wish to be alerted at lower ground motion thresholds will receive more robust warnings with longer average warning times than users who receive warnings for higher ground motion thresholds. EEW systems have the greatest potential benefit for users willing to take action at relatively low ground motion thresholds, whereas users who set relatively high thresholds for taking action are less likely to receive timely and actionable information.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A new approach to earthquake early warning
    Boese, Maren
    Erdik, Mustafa
    Wenzel, Friedemann
    EARTHQUAKE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS, 2007, : 65 - +
  • [42] Potential of Earthquake Early Warning Systems
    Friedemann Wenzel
    Michael Baur
    Frank Fiedrich
    Constantin Ionescu
    Mihnea C. Ionescu
    Natural Hazards, 2001, 23 : 407 - 416
  • [43] The development of earthquake early warning methods
    Chung, Angela I.
    NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 1 (07) : 331 - 331
  • [44] Earthquake early warning for transport lines
    Désirée Hilbring
    Tanja Titzschkau
    Alfons Buchmann
    Gottfried Bonn
    Friedemann Wenzel
    Eberhard Hohnecker
    Natural Hazards, 2014, 70 : 1795 - 1825
  • [45] Benefits and Costs of Earthquake Early Warning
    Strauss, Jennifer A.
    Allen, Richard M.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 87 (03) : 765 - 772
  • [46] Discussion on Earthquake Forecasting and Early Warning
    Zhang XiaodongJiang Haikun and Li Mingxiao China Earthquake Networks CenterBeijing China
    Earthquake Research in China, 2008, 22 (04) : 416 - 427
  • [47] Earthquake early warning system in Japan
    Doi, K
    EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS FOR NATURAL DISASTER REDUCTION, 2000, : 447 - 452
  • [48] Earthquake early warning application to buildings
    Cheng, Ming Hei
    Wu, Stephen
    Heaton, Thomas H.
    Beck, James L.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 60 : 155 - 164
  • [49] Earthquake Early Warning Hospital Applications
    Horiuchi, Yoshihito
    JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2009, 4 (04) : 565 - 569
  • [50] Potential of earthquake early warning systems
    Wenzel, F
    Baur, M
    Fiedrich, F
    Ionescu, C
    Ionescu, MC
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2001, 23 (2-3) : 407 - 416