Adoption and extent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi

被引:87
|
作者
Ngwira, A. [1 ]
Johnsen, F. H. [2 ]
Aune, J. B. [1 ]
Mekuria, M. [3 ]
Thierfelder, C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies, As, Norway
[2] Fac Appl Ecol & Agr Sci, Dept Agr Sci, Blaestad, Elverum, Norway
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Southern Africa Reg Off, Socioecon Program, Harare, Zimbabwe
[4] CIMMYT Southern Africa Reg Off, Harare, Zimbabwe
关键词
adoption; agency; conservation agriculture; smallholders; social structures; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; TILLAGE; SOIL; TECHNOLOGY; DIFFUSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.69.2.107
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding factors affecting farmers' adoption of improved technologies is critical to success of conservation agriculture (CA) program implementation. This study, which explored the factors that determine adoption and extent of farmers' use of the three principles of CA (i.e., minimum soil disturbance, permanent soil cover with crop residues, and crop rotations), was conducted in 10 target communities in 8 extension planning areas in Malawi. The primary data was collected using structured questionnaires administered to individual households. Triangulation with key informant interviews, field observations, and interactive discussions with farmers and farmer groups provided information behind contextual issues underpinning the statistical inferences. From a total of 15,854 households in the study areas, it is estimated that 18% of the smallholder farmers had adopted CA, representing an area of about 678 ha (1,675 ac; 2.1% of all cultivated land). Land area under CA constituted about 30% of total cultivated land among adopters. A random sample of 151 adopters and 149 nonadopters proportional with respect to adoption rates was drawn from various communities and interviewed using structured questionnaires. A total of 30 key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders including staff of Total Land Care, government extension workers, agroinput suppliers, and lead farmers. The first stage of the Heckman model showed that hired labor, area of land cultivated, membership to farmer group, and district influenced farmers' decisions to adopt CA. The second stage of Heckman model results suggested that total cultivated land, duration of practicing CA, and district influenced farmers' decisions to extend their land to CA. Our study can be used to show the agency and social structures that are likely to influence adoption and extent of CA. Future policy should address ways to provide access to information and long-term support to farmers to enable them to embrace the technology fully.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:107 / 119
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Determinants of Smallholder Farmers' Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices in Zomba, Eastern Malawi
    Shani, Feston Ken
    Joshua, Mirriam
    Ngongondo, Cosmo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [22] Factors Influencing Adoption of Sustainable Soil and Water Conservation Practices among Smallholder Farmers in Kwara State, Nigeria
    Iyilade, Abigail Oluwatunmise
    Alalade, Oluwasegun Ayodeji
    Longe, Morenike Peju
    Olubunmi, Alokan Agnes
    Blessing, Akinola-soji
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, 2020, 24 (04): : 113 - 121
  • [23] Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Farmers in Kentucky, USA
    Bijesh Mishra
    Buddhi R. Gyawali
    Krishna P. Paudel
    Neelam C. Poudyal
    Marion F. Simon
    Siddhartha Dasgupta
    George Antonious
    Environmental Management, 2018, 62 : 1060 - 1072
  • [24] Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Farmers in Kentucky, USA
    Mishra, Bijesh
    Gyawali, Buddhi R.
    Paudel, Krishna P.
    Poudyal, Neelam C.
    Simon, Marion F.
    Dasgupta, Siddhartha
    Antonious, George
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 62 (06) : 1060 - 1072
  • [25] Factors supporting the adoption of soil conservation practices: Evidence from Ecuadorian smallholder farmers
    Singana Tapia, David
    Satama Bermeo, Maritza
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (04) : 658 - 669
  • [26] Knowledge gaps among smallholder farmers hinder adoption of conservation biological control
    Mkenda, Prisila A.
    Ndakidemi, Patrick A.
    Stevenson, Philip C.
    Arnold, Sarah E. J.
    Darbyshire, Iain
    Belmain, Steven R.
    Priebe, Jan
    Johnson, Anne C.
    Tumbo, Julie
    Gurr, Geoff M.
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (03) : 256 - 277
  • [27] Assessment of Conservation Agriculture Practices by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa
    Muzangwa, Lindah
    Mnkeni, Pearson Nyari Stephano
    Chiduza, Cornelius
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [28] Relative Preferences for Soil Conservation Incentives among Smallholder Farmers: Evidence from Malawi
    Marenya, Paswel
    Smith, Vincent H.
    Nkonya, Ephraim
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (03) : 690 - 710
  • [29] Determinants of adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Nigeria
    Oyetunde-Usman, Zainab
    Olagunju, Kehinde Oluseyi
    Ogunpaimo, Oyinlola Rafiat
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [30] Factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    Nkonki-Mandleni, Busisiwe
    Manenzhe, Nnditsheni Godfrey
    Omotayo, Abiodun Olusola
    OPEN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 7 (01): : 596 - 604