The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures

被引:119
|
作者
Koch, PP
Gross, DFL
Gerber, C
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Orthopaed, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Div Anesthesiol, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Kantonsspital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mse.2002.121634
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
At the Department of Orthopaedics of the Kantonsspital Fribourg, 67 humeral shaft fractures were treated by Sarmiento bracing in a 15-year period. There were 54 isolated fractures and 73 fractures sustained as a component of polytrauma. Fifty-eight cases (87%) hod healed clinically at a mean of 7 0 weeks; 9 cases failed to heal, so further treatment was carried out operatively. Of the conservatively managed fractures, 95% (55 cases) heated with an excellent or good result. Three patients noted a slight limitation of active range of motion, but all 58 patients returned to full duty at their jobs. Among 9 patients with delayed or nonunion leading to operative intervention, there were 6 cases with transverse fractures. Major reasons for failed conservative management were an incorrect indication, a significant axial deformity or a hyperextended position of the fracture fragments. In our experience, active repositioning of humeral shaft fractures is not effective in avoiding a delay in fracture healing. The decision to use functional bracing in polytrauma patients should depend on the time of expected bedridden immobilization, on the presence of additional fractures of the ipsilateral upper extremity and on the patient's need for crutches. The conservative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with the Sarmiento brace remains the treatment of choice, in spite of newer intramedullary operations that are allegedly minimally invasive and technically less complicated.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 150
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FRACTURES OF THE SHAFT OF THE TIBIA TREATED CONSERVATIVELY WITH FUNCTIONAL BRACING
    PAUS, A
    GJENGEDAL, E
    ROLFSEN, L
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1983, 54 (03): : 504 - 505
  • [32] Humeral shaft fractures
    Andre R. Spiguel
    Robert J. Steffner
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2012, 5 (3) : 177 - 183
  • [33] HUMERAL SHAFT FRACTURES
    WITSO, E
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1985, 56 (06): : 533 - 533
  • [34] Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures
    Ozcan Pehlivan
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2002, 122 : 390 - 395
  • [35] Humeral shaft fractures
    Updegrove, Gary F.
    Mourad, Wassim
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (04) : E87 - E97
  • [36] Humeral shaft fractures
    Gallusser, Nicolas
    Barimani, Bardia
    Vauclair, Frederic
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [37] Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures
    Pehlivan, O
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2002, 122 (07) : 390 - 395
  • [38] Humeral shaft fractures
    Schittko, A
    CHIRURG, 2004, 75 (08): : 833 - 846
  • [39] Humeral shaft fractures
    Spiguel, Andre R.
    Steffner, Robert J.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2012, 5 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [40] Five-Year Follow-Up of Surgery vs Functional Bracing for Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Ramo, Lasse
    Ibounig, Thomas
    Sumrein, Bakir O.
    Lepola, Vesa
    Paavola, Mika
    Taimela, Simo
    Jarvinen, Teppo L. N.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (13): : 1149 - 1151