Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles

被引:94
|
作者
Friedenthal, Jenna [1 ]
Maxwell, Susan M. [1 ]
Munne, Santiago [2 ]
Kramer, Yael [1 ]
McCulloh, David H. [1 ]
McCaffrey, Caroline [1 ]
Grifo, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Fertil Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Cooper Genom, Livingston, NJ USA
关键词
Next generation sequencing; array comparative genomic hybridization; preimplantation genetic screening; mosaicism; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MOSAIC BLASTOCYSTS; ANEUPLOIDY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPLANTATION; PROTOCOL; STAGE; CGH;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate whether the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) cycles improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single university-based fertility center. Patient(s): A total of 916 STEET cycles from January 2014 to December 2016 were identified. Cases included 548 STEET cycles using NGS for PGS and controls included 368 STEET cycles using aCGH for PGS. Intervention(s): Patients having a STEET after undergoing IVF and PGS with either NGS or aCGH. Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcomes were implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OP/LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (PR), and spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate. Result(s): The implantation rate was significantly higher in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (71.6% vs. 64.6%). The OP/ LBR was also significantly higher in the NGS group (62% vs. 54.4%), and there were significantly more biochemical pregnancies in the aCGH group compared with the NGS group (15.1% vs. 8.7%). After adjustment for confounding variables with a multiple logistic regression analysis, OP/LBR remained significantly higher in the NGS group. The SAB rate was not significantly different in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (12.4% vs. 12.7%). Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic screening using NGS significantly improves pregnancy outcomes versus PGS using aCGH in STEET cycles. Next-generation sequencing has the ability to identify and screen for embryos with reduced viability such as mosaic embryos and those with partial aneuploidies or triploidy. Pregnancy outcomes with NGS may be improved due to the exclusion of these abnormal embryos. (C) 2017 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 632
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) with Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages
    Keltz, Martin D.
    Vega, Mario
    Sirota, Ido
    Lederman, Matthew
    Moshier, Erin L.
    Gonzales, Eric
    Stein, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2013, 30 (10) : 1333 - 1339
  • [42] Delayed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) show increased aneuploidy rates but can lead to live births with single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET)
    Nidhee M. Sachdev
    James A. Grifo
    Frederick Licciardi
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2016, 33 : 1501 - 1505
  • [43] Delayed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) show increased aneuploidy rates but can lead to live births with single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET)
    Sachdev, Nidhee M.
    Grifo, James A.
    Licciardi, Frederick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (11) : 1501 - 1505
  • [44] Correspondence: Interpreting live birth rates following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: per embryo transferred or initiated cycle*Re: "Live birth per embryo transfer with next generation sequencing preimplantation genetic testing: an analysis of 26,107 cycles"
    Monteleone, Pedro Augusto Araujo
    Bonetti, Tatiana Carvalho de Souza
    [J]. SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 69 (05) : 394 - 395
  • [45] PREGNANCY RATES FOLLOWING FRESH DAY 6, FRESH DAY 7 OR FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER (FET) OF EUPLOID BLASTOCYSTS AFTER MICRO-ARRAY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION (aCGH) ANALYSIS.
    Barritt, J.
    Hill, D.
    Surrey, M.
    Tormasi, S.
    Kerr, L.
    Munne, S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S196 - S196
  • [46] SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER UTILIZING HIGH RESOLUTION OR LOW RESOLUTION NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING FOR PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING IN ≤35 AND >35 YEAR OLD PATIENTS: RESULTS FROM A SINGLE CENTER.
    Taylor, T. H.
    Patrick, J. L.
    Hewitt, W.
    Whelan, J. G.
    Johnson, L. N.
    Katz, S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E404 - E404
  • [47] Next-generation sequencing (NGS), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) for precision medicine in advanced breast cancer: A single-center prospective study
    Goncalves, A.
    Bertucci, F.
    Chaffanet, M.
    Guille, A.
    Gamier, S.
    Adelaide, J.
    Carbuccia, N.
    Brunelle, S.
    Piana, G.
    Cabaud, O.
    Thomassin-Piana, J.
    Paciencia-Gros, M.
    Chereau-Ewald, E.
    Lambaudie, E.
    Sabatier, R.
    Tarpin, C.
    Provansal, M.
    Jalaguier-Coudray, A.
    Extra, J-M
    Sarran, A.
    Pakradouni, J.
    Viens, P.
    Lopez, M.
    Ginestier, C.
    Charafe-Jauffret, E.
    Birnbaum, D.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76