Comparison of an in-house developed monitor unit double-check program for 3D conformal radiation therapy and treatment planning system verification

被引:1
|
作者
Slassi, Noureddine [1 ]
Ouabi, Hmad [2 ]
El Khayati, Naima [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed V Univ Rabat, Fac Sci, Ibn Battouta OB 1014, Rabat, Morocco
[2] AL AZHAR Oncol Ctr, Dist Hassan OB 10020, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
independent monitor unit calculation; asymmetric fields; multi-leaf collimator-shaped fields; quality assurance; treatment planning; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSE CALCULATION; RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; SOFTWARE; ONCOLOGY; FIELDS; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396918000742
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim The treatment planning system (TPS) plays a key role in radiotherapy treatments; it is responsible for the accurate determination of the monitor unit (MU) needed to be delivered to treat a patient with cancer. The main goal of radiotherapy is to sterilise the tumour; however, any imprecise dose delivered could lead to deadly consequences. The TPS has a quality assurance tool, an independent program to double check the MU, evaluate patient plan correctness and search for any potential error. Materials and methods In this work, a comparison was carried out between a MU calculated by TPS and an independent in-house-developed monitor unit calculation program (MUCP). The program, written in Cplusplus (C++ Object-Oriented), requires a database of several measured quantities and uses a recently developed physically based method for field equivalence calculation. The ROOT CERN data analysis library has been used to establish fit functions, to extend MUCP use to a variety of photon beams. This study presents a new approach to checking MU correctness calculated by the TPS for a water-like tissue equivalent medium, using our MUCP, as the majority of previous studies on the MU independent checks were based on the Clarkson method. To evaluate each irradiated region, four calculation points corresponding to relative depths under the water phantom were tested for several symmetric, asymmetric, irregular symmetric and asymmetric field cases. A comparison of MU for each radiation fields from readings of the TPS and the MUCP was undertaken. Results A satisfactory agreement has been obtained and within the required standards (3%). Additional experimental measurements of dose deposited in a water phantom showed a deviation of Findings The MUCP is a useful tool for basic and complex MU verification for 3D conformal radiation therapy plans.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 261
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] 3D treatment planning for conformal radiation therapy
    Bruinvis, IAD
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, VOL 2, CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 644 - 647
  • [2] Verification of monitor unit calculations for a 3D treatment planning system in clinical practice
    Sanford, R
    Al-Ghazi, M
    Orlowski, E
    Dunia, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1205 - 1205
  • [3] In-house quality check of external beam plans using 3D treatment planning systems - a DVH comparison
    Kumar, Ayyalasomayajula Anil
    Akula, Roopa Rani
    Ayyangar, Komanduri
    Reddy, Krishna P.
    Vuppu, Srinivas
    Narayana, P. V. Lakshmi
    Rao, A. Durga Prasada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03): : 138 - 146
  • [4] Comparison of 507 treatments calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program
    Haslam, J
    Bonta, D
    Lujan, A
    Rash, C
    Jackson, W
    Roeske, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1499 - 1499
  • [5] Commercial vs In-House Developed Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning System for Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: A Treatment Planning Comparison
    Liu, C.
    Sio, T.
    Shan, J.
    Schild, S.
    Daniels, T.
    DeWees, T.
    Hu, Y.
    Ding, X.
    Bues, M.
    Liu, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E596 - E596
  • [6] Evaluation and comparison of second-check monitor unit calculation software with Pinnacle3 treatment planning system
    Tuazon, B.
    Narayanasamy, G.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Kirby, N.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Stathakis, S.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 : 186 - 191
  • [7] Dosimetric verification of a commercial 3D treatment planning system for conformal radiotherapy with a dynamic multileaf collimator
    Pignoli, E
    Serretiello, S
    Somigliana, A
    Zonca, G
    Pellegrini, R
    Mongioj, V
    Marchesini, R
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (08): : N77 - N84
  • [8] Dosimetric verification of a dedicated 3D treatment planning system for episcleral plaque therapy
    Knutsen, S
    Hafslund, R
    Monge, OR
    Valen, H
    Muren, LP
    Rekstad, BL
    Krohn, J
    Dahl, O
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04): : 1159 - 1166
  • [9] Treatment planning and 3D dose verification of whole brain radiation therapy with hippocampal avoidance in rats
    Yoon, S. W.
    Miles, D.
    Cramer, C.
    Reinsvold, M.
    Kirsch, D.
    Oldham, M.
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 847
  • [10] A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours
    Cozzi, L
    Fogliata, A
    Lomax, A
    Bolsi, A
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) : 287 - 297