Sexual Dimorphism in Human Cranial Trait Scores: Effects of Population, Age, and Body Size

被引:73
|
作者
Garvin, Heather M. [1 ,2 ]
Sholts, Sabrina B. [3 ]
Mosca, Laurel A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mercyhurst Univ, Dept Anthropol Archaeol, Erie, PA 16546 USA
[2] Mercyhurst Univ, Dept Appl Forens Sci, Erie, PA 16546 USA
[3] Smithsonian Inst, Dept Anthropol, Natl Museum Nat Hist, Washington, DC 20013 USA
关键词
sex estimation; ordinal scores; non-metric traits; Walker method; forensic anthropology; GREATER SCIATIC NOTCH; AMERICAN WHITES; LONG BONES; STATURE; LENGTHS; SKULL; MASS;
D O I
10.1002/ajpa.22502
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Sex estimation from the skull is commonly performed by physical and forensic anthropologists using a five-trait scoring system developed by Walker. Despite the popularity of this method, validation studies evaluating its accuracy across a variety of samples are lacking. Furthermore, it remains unclear what other intrinsic or extrinsic variables are related to the expression of these traits. In this study, cranial trait scores and postcranial measurements were collected from four diverse population groups (U.S. Whites, U.S. Blacks, medieval Nubians, and Arikara Native Americans) following Walker's protocols (total n=499). Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to evaluate the accuracy of these traits in sex estimation, and to test for the effects of population, age, and body size on trait expressions. Results revealed significant effects of population on all trait scores. Sample-specific correct sex classification rates ranged from 74% to 94%, with an overall accuracy of 85% for the pooled sample. Classification performance varied among the traits (best for glabella and mastoid scores and worst for nuchal scores). Furthermore, correlations between traits were weak or nonsignificant, suggesting that different factors may influence individual traits. Some traits displayed correlations with age and/or postcranial size that were significant but weak, and within-population analyses did not reveal any consistent relationships between these traits across all groups. These results indicate that neither age nor body size plays a large role in trait expression, and thus does not need to be incorporated into sex estimation methods. Am J Phys Anthropol 154:259-269, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 269
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Invasive American Bullfrogs Age, Body Size, and Sexual Size Dimorphism Geographical Variation in Northwestern China
    Xu, Feng
    Li, Jun
    Yang, Weikang
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (11):
  • [22] Body Size, Size Variation, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Early Homo
    Plavcan, J. Michael
    CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2012, 53 : S409 - S423
  • [23] Body size and sexual dimorphism among a population of corsac and red foxes in central Mongolia
    Murdoch, James D.
    Munkhzul, Tserendorj
    Buyandelger, Suuri
    Reading, Richard P.
    MAMMALIA, 2009, 73 (01) : 72 - 75
  • [25] Cranial size and shape sexual dimorphism in the Kangal dog from Turkey
    Miguel Pares-Casanova, Pere
    Siddiq, Abu Bakar
    Onar, Veciat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 44 (02): : 396 - 403
  • [26] Sexual dimorphism in cranial size and shape:: Miopithecus talapoin (Primates, Cercopithecidae).
    Hood, CS
    Askar, M
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2000, 40 (06): : 1063 - 1064
  • [27] Cranial base sexual dimorphism: Size and shape and their taxonomic significance.
    Nevell, L
    Wood, B
    Luboga, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2003, : 157 - 157
  • [28] Sexual size dimorphism in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis):: effects of population density
    LeBlanc, M
    Festa-Bianchet, M
    Jorgenson, JT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 79 (09) : 1661 - 1670
  • [29] DARWINS FINCHES AND EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BODY SIZE
    DOWNHOWER, JF
    NATURE, 1976, 263 (5578) : 558 - 563
  • [30] Sexual dimorphism in the ontogeny of rhesus macaque body size
    Turcotte, Cassandra M.
    Mann, Eva H. J.
    Stock, Michala K.
    Villamil, Catalina I.
    Montague, Michael J.
    Dickinson, Edwin
    Surratt, Samuel Bauman
    Martinez, Melween
    Williams, Scott A.
    Anton, Susan C.
    Higham, James P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2022, 177 : 186 - 186