Collaborative Risk Management for Public-Private Partnership Projects in Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Guomin [1 ]
Jin, XiaoHua [1 ]
Huang, Chunyan [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Chem Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
关键词
collaborative risk management; Public Private Partnership; project alliancing; partnering; Australia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Emphasizing risk sharing, collaborative-based procurement methods such as Project Alliancing (PA) have achieved excellence in many public and private projects in Australia. In light of the heightened trend in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) utilization in the State Governments in Australia, improving risk management serves even greater motivation in engaging this procurement model on the back of past failures. It is feasible in suggesting there are risk management lessons to be learnt and traits to be borrowed from PA for the PPP model. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the literature, of both PPP and PA procurement, with respect to model characteristics, risk management processes, and past successes and failures. As a collective, these areas of research shall complement both the investigation of industry opinion as well as to ultimately generate collaborative-based risk management framework, which seek to successfully integrate into PPP risk management. The former aspect will withdraw feedback and judgment from an array of industry professionals, with varying fields and backgrounds, in light of feasibilities and statuses of both models and their gaps. The latter shall act to definitively set in place a list of inclusions characterized by PA delivery but of which is both subtle and efficient enough to be regarded as acceptable from PPP perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 437
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Public-private partnership projects in Greece: risk ranking and preferred risk allocation
    Roumboutsos, Athena
    Anagnostopoulos, Konstantinos P.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (07) : 751 - 763
  • [22] Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study
    Ke, Yongjian
    Wang, ShouQing
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (04) : 343 - 351
  • [23] Identifying Measures of Effective Risk Management for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries
    Mazher, Khwaja Mateen
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Choudhry, Rafiq M.
    Zahoor, Hafiz
    Edwards, David J.
    Ghaithan, Ahmed M.
    Mohammed, Awsan
    Aziz, Mubashir
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [24] Approaches to Risk Identification in Public-Private Partnership Projects: Malaysian Private Partners' Overview
    Sarvari, Hadi
    Valipour, Alireza
    Yahya, Nordin
    Noor, Norhazilan M. D.
    Beer, Michael
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 9 (01)
  • [25] Public-Private Partnership Project Risk Management in Education Industry
    Meng, Jinglei
    Xiu, Guoyi
    Qian, Fan
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES-THEORY & PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (06): : 2941 - 2948
  • [26] Impact of Public Sector on Sustainability of Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Ma, Hanyang
    Zeng, Saixing
    Lin, Han
    Zeng, Ruochen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (02)
  • [27] A paradigm shift in risk management in public-private partnership arrangements
    Lima, Sonia
    Brochado, Ana
    Marques, Rui
    [J]. WATER POLICY, 2021, 23 (06) : 1344 - 1358
  • [28] Bundling in public-private partnership projects - a conceptual framework
    Dolla, Tharun
    Laishram, Boeing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 69 (06) : 1177 - 1203
  • [29] REAL OPTIONS IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS: AN OVERVIEW
    Ben Abdallah, Skander
    [J]. ACTUALITE ECONOMIQUE, 2019, 95 (2-3): : 323 - 346
  • [30] METHODOLOGY OF EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS
    Kuznyetsova, A.
    Klipkova
    Maslov, V
    [J]. FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 6 (41): : 339 - 349