ObjectivesPrevious general population survey research has found that, relative to monetary incentives, altruistic appeals are ineffective in increasing survey response and that offering additional monetary incentives is always desirable. We consider an alternative populationa pro-social populationand ask whether these same conclusions apply. MethodsTo evaluate the relative effectiveness of different incentive strategies, we randomly assign individuals to one of five conditions. We consider altruistic incentives (a narrative appeal or a charitable donation) and monetary incentives (three separate lotteries). ResultsAmong pro-social individuals, less is more: altruistic appeals are just as effective, if not more effective, than costly monetary incentives. Moreover, the simplest lottery structure (fewer large-payoff prizes) is the most cost effective of the lotteries. ConclusionsThe target population of interest matters when designing survey incentive strategies. Moreover, increasing the incentives budget is not always beneficial.
机构:
Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USADuke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USA
Pokorney, Sean D.
Peterson, Eric D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USADuke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USA
Peterson, Eric D.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USADuke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Div Cardiol, 2301 Erwin Rd,DUMC 3845, Durham, NC 27710 USA