A light-weight integration of automated and interactive theorem proving

被引:5
|
作者
Kanso, Karim [1 ]
Setzer, Anton [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0960129514000140
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this paper, aimed at dependently typed programmers, we present a novel connection between automated and interactive theorem proving paradigms. The novelty is that the connection offers a better trade-off between usability, efficiency and soundness when compared to existing techniques. This technique allows for a powerful interactive proof framework that facilitates efficient verification of finite domain theorems and guided construction of the proof of infinite domain theorems. Such situations typically occur with industrial verification. As a case study, an embedding of SAT and CTL model checking is presented, both of which have been implemented for the dependently typed proof assistant Agda. Finally, an example of a real world railway control system is presented, and shown using our proof framework to be safe with respect to an abstract model of trains not colliding or derailing. We demonstrate how to formulate safety directly and show using interactive theorem proving that signalling principles imply safety. Therefore, a proof by an automated theorem prover that the signalling principles hold for a concrete system implies the overall safety. Therefore, instead of the need for domain experts to validate that the signalling principles imply safety they only need to make sure that the safety is formulated correctly. Therefore, some of the validation is replaced by verification using interactive theorem proving.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 153
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AUTOMATED THEOREM-PROVING METHODS
    NOSSUM, R
    BIT, 1985, 25 (01): : 51 - 64
  • [32] Automated theorem proving with disjunctive constraints
    Ibens, O
    PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING-CP'99, 1999, 1713 : 484 - 485
  • [33] Strategy selection for automated theorem proving
    Wolf, A
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: METHODOLOGY SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 1480 : 452 - 465
  • [34] A tool for automated theorem proving in Agda
    Lindblad, F
    Benke, M
    TYPES FOR PROOFS AND PROGRAMS, 2006, 3839 : 154 - 169
  • [35] Proof simplification and automated theorem proving
    Kinyon, Michael
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2019, 377 (2140):
  • [36] Designing for Light-Weight Collaboration: The Case of Interactive Citizens' Advisory Services
    Schwabe, Gerhard
    Bretscher, Claudia
    Sehenk, Birgit
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 6105 : 449 - +
  • [37] A NOTE ON INTERACTIVE THEOREM-PROVING WITH THEOREM CONTINUATION FUNCTIONS
    CHOU, CT
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 20 : 59 - 69
  • [38] Automated theorem proving in support of computer algebra: Symbolic definite integration as a case study
    Adams, AA
    Gottliebsen, H
    Linton, SA
    Martin, U
    ISSAC 99: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYMBOLIC AND ALGEBRAIC COMPUTATION, 1999, : 253 - 260
  • [39] Interactive Theorem Proving Preface of the Special Issue
    Klein, Gerwin
    Gamboa, Ruben
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2016, 56 (03) : 201 - 203
  • [40] Light-weight UIMS
    Read, Robert L.
    Smith, Martin L.
    Software - Practice and Experience, 1991, 21 (01) : 13 - 33