Effects of UV and visible light on cyanobacteria at the cellular level

被引:32
|
作者
Sinha, RP
Richter, P
Faddoul, J
Braun, M
Häder, DP
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Bot & Pharmazeut Biol, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Damascus Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Plant Protect, Damascus, Syria
[3] Univ Bonn, Inst Bot, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b203955a
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The effect of UV and visible light on cyanobacteria was determined at the cellular level by means of epifluorescence and confocal microscopy techniques. These methods allow the examination of light effects in spatial resolution. Series of measurements were performed to determine the effect of different light qualities and quantities on cyanobacteria. To analyze the effect of the light quality, samples of Anabaena and Scytonema sp. were exposed to intense blue, green or red light applied from the epifluorescence path of the microscope. The fluorescence of the phycobiliproteins was recorded by means of epifluorescence (excitation 550 run, 20 nm half band width (HBW), emission above 635 nm) or by confocal microscopy (560 nm laser line). Upon exposure to blue or green light the cells showed an increase in fluorescence followed by a sudden and complete loss of fluorescence. Blue light was more effective (bleaching of phycobiliproteins within 45 min) than green light (bleaching within 120 min). Red light was not as effective, and bleaching of the cells took at least 24 h. Initially the cells showed an increase in fluorescence followed by fast bleaching of the fluorescence signal. Cells exposed to UV plus PAR were bleached within 60 min, while cells exposed to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) only were totally bleached after about 120 min. FL-DHP (dihydropyridine) labeling was performed in two cyanobacteria, Anabaena sp. and Nostoc commune, to visualize L-type calcium channels. Both cyanobacterial strains showed a pronounced FL-DHP signal of the heterocysts and akinetes but only a weak signal from the vegetative cells. The results clearly indicate the presence of calcium channels in these cells. UV radiation decreased the amount of chlorophyll and phycocyanin as could be seen from a decline in the autofluorescence of the cells. In contrast, the FL-DHP signal was not affected by UV.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 559
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UV-visible light reshaping of gold nanorods
    Al-Sherbini, El-Sayed A. M.
    MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 121 (1-2) : 349 - 353
  • [22] EXPANDING CAPABILITIES WITH UV/VISIBLE LIGHT CURING ADHESIVES
    BACHMANN, C
    ADHESIVES AGE, 1995, 38 (04): : 14 - &
  • [23] Photocatalytic soot degradation under UV and visible light
    Myrthe Van Hal
    Silvia Lenaerts
    Sammy W. Verbruggen
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 22262 - 22272
  • [24] Sensing of UV and visible light by powdery mildew pathogens
    Pathak, R.
    Sundaram, A.
    Cadle-Davidson, L. E.
    Solhaug, K. A.
    Stensvand, A.
    Gislerod, H. R.
    Suthaparan, A.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 107 (12) : 47 - 48
  • [25] Photocatalytic soot degradation under UV and visible light
    Van Hal, Myrthe
    Lenaerts, Silvia
    Verbruggen, Sammy W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (09) : 22262 - 22272
  • [26] Report on the ESF workshop on visible and UV light stress
    Etienne, AL
    Kirilovsky, D
    Vass, I
    PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 115 (02) : R5 - R7
  • [27] Inactivation of carboxypeptidase A and trypsin by UV-visible light
    Ibarz, Albert
    Garvin, Alfonso
    Garza, Salvador
    Pagan, Jordi
    INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 10 (04) : 517 - 521
  • [28] SiC Visible Light Blindness UV Avalanche Photodiodes
    Yang C.
    Su L.
    Xia K.
    Ma W.
    Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49 (24):
  • [29] UV protectants in cyanobacteria
    Sinha, Rajeshwar P.
    Haeder, Donat-P.
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2008, 174 (03) : 278 - 289
  • [30] UV protection in cyanobacteria
    Ehling-Schulz, M
    Scherer, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 1999, 34 (04) : 329 - 338