Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?

被引:2
|
作者
Kanber, Yonca [1 ,2 ]
Charbonneau, Michele [2 ]
Auger, Manon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Pathol, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Pathol, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
关键词
atypical glandular cells (AGC); glandular cell abnormalities; rapid prescreening; rescreening; INTERNAL QUALITY-CONTROL; PAPANICOLAOU SMEARS; CERVICAL CYTOLOGY; UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; GYNECOLOGIC CYTOLOGY; FOLLOW-UP; ASSURANCE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21601
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDRapid prescreening (RPS) is one of the quality assurance (QA) methods used in gynecologic cytology. The efficacy of RPS has been previously studied but mostly with respect to squamous lesions; in fact, there has been no study so far specifically looking at the sensitivity of RPS for detecting glandular cell abnormalities. METHODSA total of 80,565 Papanicolaou (Pap) smears underwent RPS during a 25-month period. A sample was designated as review for abnormality (R) if any abnormal cells (at the threshold of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/atypical glandular cells [AGC]) were thought to be present or was designated as negative (N) if none were detected. Each sample then underwent full screening (FS) and was designated as either R or N and also given a cytologic interpretation. RESULTSThe final cytologic interpretation was a glandular cell abnormality (AGC) in 107 samples (0.13%); 39 of these (36.4%) were flagged as R on RPS. Twenty-four patients (33.8%) out of 71 who had histologic follow-up were found to harbor a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma; 13 of those 24 Pap smears (54.2%) had been flagged as R on RPS. Notably, 11 AGC cases were picked up by RPS only and not by FS and represented false-negative cases; 2 of these showed endometrial adenocarcinoma on histologic follow-up. CONCLUSIONSPap smears with glandular cell abnormalities are often flagged as abnormal by RPS, and this results in a sensitivity of 36.4% (at the AGC threshold). Most importantly, some cases of AGC are detected on Pap smears by RPS only, and this demonstrates that RPS is a valuable QA method. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:739-744. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. A significant fraction (36.4%) of atypical glandular cell lesions are identified by rapid prescreening; some of these (10.3%) are picked up by rapid prescreening only (and not by full screening). Rapid prescreening helps to reduce the false-negative rate of atypical glandular cells in gynecologic cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 744
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Atypical glandular cells in Pap smears: A retrospective study with histopathological correlation
    Polat, A. Yucel
    Tepeoglu, M.
    Tunca, M. Z.
    Ayva, E. S.
    Ozen, O.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S237 - S237
  • [22] Identification of Atypical Glandular Cells in Pap Smears: Is It a Hit and Miss Scenario?
    Ajit, D.
    Gavas, S.
    Joseph, S.
    Rekhi, B.
    Deodhar, K.
    Kane, S.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2013, 57 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [23] Correlation of cytotechnologists parameters with their performance in rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears
    Djemli, Amina
    Khetani, Karim
    Case, Bruce W.
    Auger, Manon
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05): : 306 - 310
  • [24] Clinicopathological features of atypical glandular cells, not otherwise specified, on cervicovaginal pap smears
    Aytekin, Okan
    Cakir, Caner
    Unsal, Mehmet
    Celik, Fatih
    Tokalioglu, Abdurrahman Alp
    Kilic, Fatih
    Ersak, Burak
    Codal, Bahadir
    Kahraman, Alper
    Gokkaya, Mustafa
    Ayhan, Sevgi
    Akar, Serra
    Cesur, Nesibe
    Erdogan, Fazli
    Ozdal, Bulent
    Oktar, Okan
    Koc, Sevgi
    Boran, Nurettin
    Comert, Gunsu Kimyon
    Ureyen, Isin
    Toptas, Tayfun
    Korkmaz, Vakkas
    Ustun, Yaprak
    Tekin, Ozlem Moraloglu
    Turkmen, Osman
    Turan, Taner
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 34 (02) : 130 - 137
  • [25] Predictive value of diagnoses of endocervical glandular abnormalities in cervical smears
    Segal, A
    Frost, FA
    Miranda, A
    Fletcher, C
    Sterrett, GF
    PATHOLOGY, 2003, 35 (03) : 198 - 203
  • [26] Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance Pap smears: appropriate evaluation and management
    Burnett, AF
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 12 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [27] Rapid (partial) prescreening of cervical smears: the quality control method of choice?
    Brooke, D
    Dudding, N
    Sutton, J
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : 191 - 199
  • [28] Histological follow-up in patients with atypical glandular cells on Pap smears
    Boyraz, Gokhan
    Basaran, Derman
    Salman, Mehmet Coskun
    Ibrahimov, Akbar
    Onder, Sevgen
    Akman, Orkun
    Ozgul, Nejat
    Yuce, Kunter
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2017, 34 (04) : 203 - 207
  • [29] Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal pap smears
    Kim, TJ
    Kim, HS
    Park, CT
    Park, IS
    Hong, SR
    Park, JS
    Shim, JU
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 73 (02) : 292 - 298
  • [30] Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus DNA Detected in Atypical Glandular Cell Pap Tests
    Mulhem, Elie
    Amin, Mitual
    Copeland, Jonathan
    Sharma, John
    Hunter, Sue
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (02) : 155 - 159