Development of the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) for ophthalmology from 2004 to 2012

被引:5
|
作者
Schargus, M. [1 ]
Gass, P. [2 ]
Neubauer, A. [3 ,4 ]
Kotas, M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Augenklin, D-44892 Bochum, Germany
[2] Deutsch Ophthalmol Gesell, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Augenklin, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[4] IfG Inst Gesundheitsokonom, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGE | 2014年 / 111卷 / 04期
关键词
German diagnosis related groups; Inpatient reimbursement; Germany; Costs; Length of stay;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-013-2886-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
In 2003 the German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) were introduced for reimbursement of inpatient treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the development of G-DRGs in ophthalmology in Germany (MDC02) from 2004 to 2012 by means of data from the Institute for the Reimbursement System in Hospitals (InEK). The data regarding costs, cost weighting and mean length of stay (LOS) from the G-DRG reports of the InEK from 2004 to 2012 in 9 representative surgical and non-surgical ophthalmological treatment case groups were analyzed. Differences in the coding system as well as alterations between the G-DRGs over the course of time were taken into consideration. The cost weightings were calculated taking the year 2004 as the baseline and are presented in the form of graphs. The selected cases cover 54 % of all G-DRG cases used by the InEK for G-DRG calculations. For 6 out of the 9 case groups there was a cost/reimbursement reduction by nearly one third of the calculated costs by InEK from 2004 to 2012. Only one case group showed an increase in costs by 23 % which can be explained by alterations in graft costs in this case group. The mean LOS decreased over the time period in the 9 groups investigated by up to 40 % and on average by -aEuro parts per thousand 22.3 %. The annually calculated costs of the InEK directly influence the calculation of the cost weightings and reimbursement and are therefore important for every hospital. During the time period analyzed a high reduction in costs and LOS in the majority of the analyzed case groups were found.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 364
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experiences with the introduction of diagnosis related groups (DRG) in the Hungarian ophthalmology
    Lampe, Z.
    Boncz, I.
    Sebestyen, A.
    Berta, A.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2007, 224 (07) : 575 - 579
  • [22] DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS (DRG) PAYMENT AND CLINICAL RESEARCH - IN SEARCH OF THE PROBLEM
    WAGNER, JL
    POWER, EJ
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1986, 4 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [23] Changes to diagnosis-related groups in urology in 2007.: Urology in the G-DRG-System 2007
    Wenke, A.
    Franz, D.
    Puehse, G.
    Hertle, L.
    Roeder, N.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (02): : 182 - 189
  • [24] Remarks on the introduction of the German Diagnosis-Related Groups (G-DRGs) for the specialty of urology
    Volkmer, BG
    Gottfried, HW
    Gschwend, JE
    Hautmann, RE
    UROLOGE A, 2003, 42 (04): : 496 - +
  • [25] Headache in tee diagnosis-related groups (DRG) era: Management and appropriateness of admission
    Sances, G
    Sandrini, G
    Costa, A
    Antonaci, F
    Citterio, A
    Nappi, G
    FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) : 224 - 229
  • [26] Diagnosis-related Groups (DRG) pricing and payment policy in China: where are we?
    Yu, Lihua
    Lang, Jingjing
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2020, 9 (06) : 771 - 773
  • [27] Remuneration for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery in the German an Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) System Current Developments and Future Action
    Franz, D.
    Schemmann, F.
    Selter, D. D.
    Auhuber, T.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    Roeder, N.
    Siebert, H.
    Mahlke, L.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2013, 116 (08): : 760 - 766
  • [28] Structure of the Australian system of 'Diagnosis Related Groups' (AR-DRG) regarding cardiovascular diseases and corresponding cost weights in Germany (G-DRG)
    Wietholt, D
    Köpfer, T
    Paul, K
    Gässler, A
    Bruch, L
    Kleber, FX
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2003, 92 (08): : 619 - 626
  • [29] G-DRG-System für die UrologieReproduzierbarkeit und KodierqualitätThe German diagnosis-related groups in urologyReproducibility and quality of coding
    B.G. Volkmer
    S. Petschl
    M. Rieder
    J. Fichtner
    G. Pühse
    K. Kleinschmidt
    J. Simon
    Der Urologe, 2008, 47 : 304 - 313
  • [30] Development of Diagnosis-Related Groups in Different Surgical Disciplines
    Lotter, O.
    Stahl, S.
    Beck, M.
    Loewe, W.
    Schaller, H. -E.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2014, 139 : E109 - E115