A comparison of biphasic insulin aspart and insulin glargine administered with oral antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Rys, P. [1 ]
Wojciechowski, P. [1 ]
Siejka, S. [1 ]
Malecki, P. [2 ]
Hak, L. [2 ]
Malecki, M. T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] HTA Consulting, Krakow, Poland
[2] Novo Nordisk Pharma, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Metab Dis, Coll Med, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[4] Univ Hosp, Krakow, Poland
关键词
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PLASMA-GLUCOSE; THERAPY; INITIATION; METFORMIN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ijcp.12337
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIt is uncertain whether the addition of biphasic insulin analogues to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) is as effective and safe as basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We performed a systematic review to compare glycaemic control and selected clinical outcomes in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with OADs whose treatment was intensified by adding biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30) or insulin glargine (IGlar). MethodsThe analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified by a systematic literature search in medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and other sources) up to March 2013. Studies met the inclusion criteria if they compared BIAsp 30 vs. IGlar added to at least one OAD in T2DM patients. Trials applying different OADs in both treatment arms were also included. Results were presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). ResultsFive trials, including a total number of 1758 patients followed up from 24 to 28weeks, were identified. Quantitative synthesis demonstrated that BIAsp 30 reduced HbA1c level more efficiently than IGlar [5 RCTs; WMD (95% CI): -0.21% (-0.35%, -0.08%)]. Differences were observed in favour of BIAsp for lower mean prandial glucose increment [3RCTs; WMD (95% CI): -14.70mg/dl (-20.09, -9.31)]; no difference was observed for fasting plasma glucose [3 RCTs; WMD (95% CI): 7.09mg/dl (-15.76, 29.94)]. We found no evidence for higher risk of overall [2 RCTs; 63% vs. 51%; OR=1.77 (0.91; 3.44)] and severe hypoglycaemic episodes [4 RCTs; 0.98% vs. 1.12%; OR (95% CI)=0.88 (0.31, 2.53)] in the BIAsp 30 group as compared with IGlar group. Twice-daily administration of BIAsp 30 resulted in larger weight gain [2 RCTs; WMD (95% CI)=1.78kg (1.04; 2.52)]. ConclusionsBIAsp 30 added to OAD therapy results in a better glycaemic control as compared with IGlar in T2DM patients. BIAsp 30 use is associated with slightly larger weight gain but no rise in risk of severe hypoglycaemic episodes.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 313
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative efficiency and safety of insulin degludec/aspart with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Long, Tao
    Lin, Jin-ting
    Lin, Min-hua
    Wu, Qian-long
    Lai, Jian-mei
    Li, Sheng-zhen
    Zhou, Zi-chao
    Zeng, Ji-yuan
    Huang, Jia-shuan
    Zeng, Chun-ping
    Lai, Yao-ming
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2022, 69 (08) : 959 - 969
  • [22] A meta-analysis of clinical therapeutic effect of insulin glargine and insulin detemir for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Zhuang, Y. G.
    Peng, H.
    Huang, F.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (19) : 2566 - 2570
  • [23] Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart and human insulin premix in patients with Type 2 diabetes
    Itoh, Hiroshi
    Morikawa, Akizuki
    Asai, Mahito
    Nishimura, Hideo
    Atoh, Keita
    Mutou, Eiji
    Oshima, Eiji
    Iwashima, Yasunor-I
    Miura, Takanori
    Sekiguchi, Masatomo
    Tani, Mitsunori
    Haneda, Masakazu
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 79 : S65 - S65
  • [24] Biphasic insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes mellitus - An evidence-based medicine review
    Gough, S. C. L.
    Tibaldi, J.
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2007, 27 (05) : 299 - 324
  • [25] Efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not achieving glycemic targets on oral antidiabetic agents
    Garber, Alan J.
    Jain, Rajeev
    Wahl, Timothy
    Moses, Alan
    Cao, Anjun
    Bressler, Peter
    DIABETES, 2006, 55 : A477 - A477
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China
    James L. Palmer
    Amélie Beaudet
    Jeremy White
    Juliette Plun-Favreau
    Jayne Smith-Palmer
    Advances in Therapy, 2010, 27 : 814 - 827
  • [27] Cost-Effectiveness of Biphasic Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Palmer, James L.
    Beaudet, Amelie
    White, Jeremy
    Plun-Favreau, Juliette
    Smith-Palmer, Jayne
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2010, 27 (11) : 814 - 827
  • [28] Review of biphasic insulin aspart in the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes
    Raja-Khan, Nazia
    Warehime, Sarah S.
    Gabbay, Robert A.
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2007, 3 (06) : 919 - 935
  • [29] Prevalence of adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boonpattharatthiti, Kansak
    Songkla, Pirune Na
    Chantara, Junpen
    Koomsri, Chanchanok
    Krass, Ines
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Dhippayom, Teerapon
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2024,
  • [30] Performance of Fast-Acting Aspart Insulin as Compared to Aspart Insulin in Insulin Pump for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
    Dutta, Deep
    Mohindra, Ritin
    Mahajan, Kunal
    Sharma, Meha
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2023, 47 (01) : 72 - 81