HOME RANGES OF SYMPATRIC MULE DEER AND WHITE-TAILED DEER IN TEXAS

被引：6

作者：

Brunjes, Kristina J. ^{[1
]}

Ballard, Warren B. ^{[1
]}

Humphrey, Mary H. ^{[2
]}

Harwell, Fieldling ^{[3
]}

McIntyre, Nancy E. ^{[4
]}

Krausman, Paul R. ^{[5
]}

Wallace, Mark C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Nat Resources Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA

[2] Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept, Sonora, TX 76950 USA

[3] Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept, Kerrville, TX 78028 USA

[4] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA

[5] Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA

来源：

SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST | 2009年 / 54卷 / 03期

关键词：

HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS; PRODUCTIVITY; MOVEMENTS; MONTANA; SIZE;

D O I：

10.1894/MD-06.1

中图分类号：

X176 [生物多样性保护];

学科分类号：

090705 ;

摘要：

Sympatry can create special dynamics between populations and impact management strategies for each species. We estimated size and overlap of ranges and core areas of sympatric female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) in west-central Texas. We captured 50 mule deer and 53 white-tailed deer, fitted them with radiocollars, and monitored their) during 2000-2002. Average (+/- SE) size of home range of mule deer in spring was 3.9 +/- 0.32 km(2), while that of white-tailed deer was 4.32 +/- 0.77 km(2); sizes of home ranges in summer were 2.82 +/- 0.32 and 2.08 +/- 0.23 km(2), respectively. Interspecific overlap of home range between seasons was similar to intraspecific overlap. Overlap in core area also was similar within and between species during summer, but, interspecific overlap in core area was less during spring.

引用

页码：253 / 260

页数：8

共 50 条

[41] Courtship strategies of white-tailed deer and mule deer males when living in sympatry
Airst, Jason
Lingle, Susan
BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 156 (3-4) : 307 - 330
[42] SERUM ASSAYS FOR DETECTING PREGNANCY IN MULE AND WHITE-TAILED DEER
WOOD, AK
SHORT, RE
DARLING, AE
DUSEK, GL
SASSER, RG
RUDER, CA
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 50 (04): : 684 - 687
[43] AGING LIVE WHITE-TAILED DEER ON SOUTHERN RANGES
DEYOUNG, CA
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (03): : 519 - 523
[44] Prion protein distribution among white-tailed deer and mule deer exocrine glands
Ness, Anthony M.
Saboraki, Kelsey
Velasquez, Camilo D.
Gushue, Danielle
Garcia, Alicia O.
Craig, Joshua
Ashrafi, Taraneh
Aiken, Judd
Lingle, Susan
McKenzie, Debbie
PRION, 2019, 13 : 49 - 49
[45] DETECTION OF PAPILLOMAVIRUSES IN CUTANEOUS FIBROMAS OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER
SUNDBERG, JP
WILLIAMS, ES
HILL, D
LANCASTER, WD
NIELSEN, SW
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1985, 46 (05) : 1145 - 1149
[46] Anti-predator strategies and grouping patterns in white-tailed deer and mule deer
Lingle, S
ETHOLOGY, 2001, 107 (04) : 295 - 314
[47] CHARACTERIZATION OF PAPILLOMAVIRUSES ISOLATED FROM CUTANEOUS FIBROMAS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER AND MULE DEER
LANCASTER, WD
SUNDBERG, JP
VIROLOGY, 1982, 123 (01) : 212 - 216
[48] HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER IN NORTHERN MONTANA
MARTINKA, CJ
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1968, 32 (03): : 558 - &
[49] Comparing the fundamental nutritional niches of mule and white-tailed deer
Staudenmaier, Anna R.
Shipley, Lisa A.
Camp, Meghan J.
Forbey, Jennifer S.
Hagerman, Ann E.
Brandt, Abigail E.
Thornton, Daniel H.
CALIFORNIA FISH AND WILDLIFE JOURNAL, 2022, 108 (03):
[50] MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND AGING OF MULE AND WHITE-TAILED DEER FETUSES
SHORT, C
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1970, 34 (02): : 383 - &

← 1 2 3 4 5 →