Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT

被引:4
|
作者
Wu, Zhenqin [1 ,2 ]
Ioannidis, Nilah M. [2 ]
Zou, James [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Chem, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN PIGMENTATION; EXPRESSION; ANNOTATION; IRF4; MC1R; IDENTIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; LOCI;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa254
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Interpreting genetic variants of unknown significance (VUS) is essential in clinical applications of genome sequencing for diagnosis and personalized care. Non-coding variants remain particularly difficult to interpret, despite making up a large majority of trait associations identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analyses. Predicting the regulatory effects of non-coding variants on candidate genes is a key step in evaluating their clinical significance. Here, we develop a machine-learning algorithm, Inference of Connected expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) (IRT), to predict the regulatory targets of non-coding variants identified in studies of eQTLs. We assemble datasets using eQTL results from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and learn to separate positive and negative pairs based on annotations characterizing the variant, gene and the intermediate sequence. IRT achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.799 using random cross-validation, and 0.700 for a more stringent position-based cross-validation. Further evaluation on rare variants and experimentally validated regulatory variants shows a significant enrichment in IRT identifying the true target genes versus negative controls. In gene-ranking experiments, IRT achieves a top-1 accuracy of 50% and top-3 accuracy of 90%. Salient features, including GC-content, histone modifications and Hi-C interactions are further analyzed and visualized to illustrate their influences on predictions. IRT can be applied to any VUS of interest and each candidate nearby gene to output a score reflecting the likelihood of regulatory effect on the expression level. These scores can be used to prioritize variants and genes to assist in patient diagnosis and GWAS follow-up studies.
引用
收藏
页码:4440 / 4448
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diverse roles of regulatory non-coding RNAs
    Wang, Zefeng
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2018, 10 (02) : 91 - 92
  • [32] Beyond the proteome: non-coding regulatory RNAs
    Szymanski, Maciej
    Barciszewski, Jan
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2002, 3 (05):
  • [33] Beyond the proteome: non-coding regulatory RNAs
    Maciej Szymański
    Jan Barciszewski
    Genome Biology, 3 (5)
  • [34] Regulatory Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Cancer
    Silva-Cazares, Macrina B.
    Perez-Plasencia, Carlos
    Lopez-Camarillo, Cesar
    CELLS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [35] Non-coding RNAs and their epigenetic regulatory mechanisms
    Zhou, Huihui
    Hu, Hu
    Lai, Maode
    BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2010, 102 (12) : 645 - 655
  • [36] Regulatory mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs
    Zhigang Luo
    Oncology and Translational Medicine, 2019, 5 (03) : 147 - 151
  • [37] The Non-Coding Regulatory RNA Revolution in Archaea
    Gelsinger, Diego Rivera
    DiRuggiero, Jocelyne
    GENES, 2018, 9 (03):
  • [38] Non-coding regulatory genetics of limb malformations
    Kumar, R. A.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2009, 76 (06) : 500 - 501
  • [39] DNA watermarks in non-coding regulatory sequences
    Heider D.
    Pyka M.
    Barnekow A.
    BMC Research Notes, 2 (1)
  • [40] CASCADE: high-throughput characterization of regulatory complex binding altered by non-coding variants
    Bray, David
    Hook, Heather
    Zhao, Rose
    Keenan, Jessica L.
    Penvose, Ashley
    Osayame, Yemi
    Mohaghegh, Nima
    Chen, Xiaoting
    Parameswaran, Sreeja
    Kottyan, Leah C.
    Weirauch, Matthew T.
    Siggers, Trevor
    CELL GENOMICS, 2022, 2 (02):