Software and hardware certification of safety-critical avionic systems: A comparison study

被引:19
|
作者
Youn, Wonkeun [1 ]
Yi, Baeck-jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Aerosp Res Inst, Aerosp Safety & Certificat Ctr, Taejon 305806, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Software and hardware quality assurance; Airborne software and hardware; Safety certification; DO-178B; DO-254;
D O I
10.1016/j.csi.2014.02.005
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
To ensure the safety of avionic systems, civil avionic software and hardware regulated by certification authorities must be certified based on applicable standards (e.g., DO-178B and DO-254). The overall safety integrity of an avionic system, comprising software and hardware, should be considered at the system level. Thus, software and hardware components should be planned, developed and certified in a unified, harmonized manner to ensure the integral safety of the entire avionic system. One of the reasons for the high development costs of avionic systems complying with standards may be a lack of sufficient understanding of how to employ these standards efficiently. Therefore, it is important to understand the similarities and differences between DO-178B and DO-254 to effectively manage the processes required by these standards, to minimize cost, and to ultimately ensure the safety of the entire avionic system. Thus, the goal of this paper is to compare various aspects of DO-178B and DO-254 comprehensively. The paper may serve as a useful supplementary material for the practitioner to understand the rationales behind and the differences between two main standards used in avionic industries. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 898
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Component-Wise Software Certification for Safety-Critical Embedded Devices
    Streitferdt, Detlef
    Zimmermann, Armin
    Schaffner, Joerg
    Kallenbach, Michael
    2017 8TH ANNUAL INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION AND ELECTROMECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IEMECON), 2017, : 175 - 180
  • [22] OPEN PLATFORM FOR EVOLUTIONARY CERTIFICATION OF SAFETY-CRITICAL SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION
    Larrucea, Xabier
    Combelles, Annie
    Favaro, John
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2013, 30 (03) : 26 - 27
  • [23] A case study of agile software development for safety-Critical systems projects
    Islam, Gibrail
    Storer, Tim
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
  • [24] A Methodology for Modeling Software Safety in Safety-Critical Computing Systems
    Kumar, S. Phani
    Ramaiah, P. Seetha
    Khanaa, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2009, 9 (07): : 185 - 193
  • [25] Scrum for safety: an agile methodology for safety-critical software systems
    Mario Barbareschi
    Salvatore Barone
    Riccardo Carbone
    Valentina Casola
    Software Quality Journal, 2022, 30 : 1067 - 1088
  • [26] Scrum for safety: an agile methodology for safety-critical software systems
    Barbareschi, Mario
    Barone, Salvatore
    Carbone, Riccardo
    Casola, Valentina
    SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2022, 30 (04) : 1067 - 1088
  • [27] Software safety risk in legacy safety-critical computer systems
    Hill, Janice
    Baggs, Rhoda
    PROCEEDINGS IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2007, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 229 - +
  • [28] Integrate hardware/software device testing for use in a safety-critical application
    Kaufman, LM
    Salinas, MH
    Williams, RD
    Giras, TC
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 132 - 137
  • [29] Holistic Obsolescence Management Model for Safety-critical Hardware and Software Components
    Jolovic M.
    Glawar R.
    Sihn W.
    ZWF Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 2022, 117 (1-2): : 61 - 65
  • [30] Ensuring system and software reliability in safety-critical systems
    Tsai, WT
    Mojdehbakhsh, R
    Zhu, F
    1998 IEEE WORKSHOP ON APPLICATION-SPECIFIC SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ASSET 98) - PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 48 - 53