Investigating the role of diffusion in hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff injection-an Eagle Ford study

被引:0
|
作者
Fu, Qinwen [1 ]
Cudjoe, Sherifa [1 ]
Ghahfarokhi, Reza Barati [1 ,2 ]
Tsau, Jyun-Syung [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoli [1 ]
Peltier, K. [2 ]
Mohrbacher, D. [3 ]
Baldwin, A. [3 ]
Nicoud, B. [3 ]
Bradford, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Chem & Petr Engn C&PE, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Tertiary Oil Recovery Program TORP, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Chesapeake Energy, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
Molecular diffusion; Hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff; Dual-permeability; Rock-fluid property; Gas injection; Eagle Ford shale; Unconventional reservoirs; EOR; IOR; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108146
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fracture complexity, variation in fluid properties, variations in rock types and diffusion of gas from the fracture into the oil-saturated nano-pores are the main contributing factors in oil recovery using gas huff-n-puff injection. Limited research has been conducted to define diffusion coefficients coupled with rock tortuosity resulting in calculation of effective diffusion. The objective of this work is to conduct a comprehensive experimental and simulation study on lower Eagle Ford rock samples to measure diffusion coefficients for different injection cycles in three representative rock samples from the main flow unit. Three representative rock samples were selected based on their differences in petrophysical properties. Saturated volumes were measured using a low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement and confirmed with material balance for cores saturated at reservoir conditions. Pressure was recorded during a one-day diffusion process before it was dropped linearly at the end of each cycle for production, and effluent oil and gas compositions were measured. NMR measurement was repeated at the end. Three compositional simulation models were set up for three different samples using tortuosity values from FIB-SEM analysis to simulate experimental diffusion and production. For history matching, relative permeability curves, fracture properties, and tortuosity were tuned to match pressure and production results for three representative samples. Pressure profiles vary significantly between different cycles caused by invasion of the gaseous phase into a new section of the pore network during each cycle. Effective diffusion coefficients were calculated using representative tortuosity values. Diffusion was represented by pressure drop during soaking time. This pressure drop varies across different lithofacies and for different rock samples. For produced oil, the concentration of lighter oil components declined from the first to the last cycle of gas injection while the concentration of the intermediate components increased. Gas huff-n-puff injection into shale oil reservoirs were being investigated from the point of view of diffusion and variations in rock properties for the first time and measurements were validated using numerical simulation. The huff-n-puff experiments, conducted using a constant volume diffusion cell with locally produced hydrocarbon gas and stock-tank oil, show favorable results. Recovery factors for samples A, B, and C are 57.5%, 56.7%, and 51.7%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance Evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff Gas Injection in Shale Gas Condensate Reservoirs
    Meng, Xingbang
    Meng, Zhan
    Ma, Jixiang
    Wang, Tengfei
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (01)
  • [22] Mitigation of near wellbore gas-condensate by CO2 huff-n-puff injection: A simulation study
    Ayub, Muhammad
    Ramadan, Moemen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 175 : 998 - 1027
  • [23] Potential to increase condensate oil production by huff-n-puff gas injection in a shale condensate reservoir
    Sheng, James J.
    Mody, Fersheed
    Griffith, Paul J.
    Barnes, Warren N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 28 : 46 - 51
  • [24] Water- and Surfactant-Based Huff-n-Puff Injection into Unconventional Liquid Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: Experimental and Modeling Study
    Scerbacova, Alexandra
    Mukhina, Elena
    Bakulin, Denis
    Burukhin, Alexander
    Ivanova, Anastasia
    Cheremisin, Alexander
    Spivakova, Margarita
    Ushakova, Alexandra
    Cheremisin, Alexey
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (15) : 11067 - 11082
  • [25] Integrated Study on Carbon Dioxide Geological Sequestration and Gas Injection Huff-n-Puff to Enhance Shale Oil Recovery
    Wang, Lei
    Cai, Shengyao
    Chen, Wenli
    Lei, Gang
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (08)
  • [26] Novel laboratory investigation of huff-n-puff gas injection for shale oils under realistic reservoir conditions
    Mahzari, Pedram
    Mitchell, Thomas M.
    Jones, Adrian P.
    Oelkers, Eric H.
    Striolo, Alberto
    Iacoviello, Francesco
    Shearing, Paul R.
    Juri, Juan Ernesto
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 284
  • [27] Experimental and numerical study of huff-n-puff gas injection to re-vaporize liquid dropout in shale gas condensate reservoirs
    Meng, Xingbang
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 35 : 444 - 454
  • [28] Upscale methodology for gas huff-n-puff process in shale oil reservoirs
    Li, Lei
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 153 : 36 - 46
  • [29] Hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff optimization of multiple horizontal wells with complex fracture networks in the M unconventional reservoir
    HaoChuan Zhang
    Yong Tang
    YouWei He
    Yong Qin
    JianHong Luo
    Yu Sun
    Ning Wang
    DeQiang Wang
    [J]. Petroleum Science, 2024, (02) - 1031
  • [30] Eagle Ford Huff 'n' Puff Gas-Injection Pilot: Comparison of Reservoir-Simulation, Material Balance, and Real Performance of the Pilot Well
    Orozco, Daniel
    Fragoso, Alfonso
    Selvan, Karthik
    Noble, Graham
    Aguilera, Roberto
    [J]. SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (01) : 247 - 260